vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Krispy Kreme, Inc. (DNUT) and SYNAPTICS Inc (SYNA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Krispy Kreme, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($392.4M vs $302.5M, roughly 1.3× SYNAPTICS Inc). SYNAPTICS Inc runs the higher net margin — -4.9% vs -7.1%, a 2.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SYNAPTICS Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.2% vs -2.9%). Krispy Kreme, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($27.9M vs $18.2M). Over the past eight quarters, SYNAPTICS Inc's revenue compounded faster (12.9% CAGR vs -5.9%).
Krispy Kreme, Inc. is an American multinational doughnut company and coffeehouse chain. Krispy Kreme was founded by Vernon Rudolph (1915–1973), who bought a yeast-raised recipe from a New Orleans chef, rented a building in 1937 in what is now historic Old Salem in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, and began selling to local grocery stores. Steady growth preceded an ambitious expansion as a public company in the period 2000 to 2016, which ultimately proved unprofitable. In 2016, the company retur...
Synaptics, Inc. is an American neural network technologies and computer-to-human interface devices development company based in San Jose, California. It develops touchpads and fingerprint biometrics technology for computer laptops; touch, display driver, and fingerprint biometrics technology for smartphones; and touch, video and far-field voice, low-power AI processors, and wireless technology for smart home devices, wearables, and automobiles. Synaptics sells its products to original equipme...
DNUT vs SYNA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $392.4M | $302.5M |
| Net Profit | $-27.8M | $-14.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 43.5% |
| Operating Margin | -1.9% | -5.0% |
| Net Margin | -7.1% | -4.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.9% | 13.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -23.8% | -922.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.18 | $-0.38 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $392.4M | $302.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $375.3M | $292.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $379.8M | $282.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $375.2M | $266.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $404.0M | $267.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $379.9M | $257.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $438.8M | $247.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $442.7M | $237.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-27.8M | $-14.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-19.4M | $-20.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-435.3M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-33.3M | $-21.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-22.4M | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.6M | $-23.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.5M | $208.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.5M | $-18.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 43.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 42.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 43.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 43.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 45.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 46.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 45.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 46.5% |
| Q4 25 | -1.9% | -5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.9% | -7.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -114.4% | -8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.4% | -9.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.8% | -5.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.2% | -11.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | -12.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.7% | -7.3% |
| Q4 25 | -7.1% | -4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.2% | -7.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -114.6% | -1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.9% | -8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.6% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.4% | -9.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.3% | 84.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.9% | -7.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.18 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $-0.53 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.55 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.20 | $-0.56 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.13 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.23 | $-0.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | $5.28 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.05 | $-0.46 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $42.4M | $437.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $911.9M | $836.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $650.1M | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $2.6B | $2.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.40× | 0.60× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $42.4M | $437.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.7M | $459.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.3M | $452.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.7M | $421.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | $596.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.4M | $853.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.6M | $876.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.1M | $828.6M |
| Q4 25 | $911.9M | $836.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $906.2M | $835.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $889.4M | $834.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $935.0M | $834.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $844.5M | $832.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $804.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $895.0M | $983.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $881.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $650.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $670.3M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $693.6M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.2B | $2.5B |
| Q4 25 | 1.40× | 0.60× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.35× | 0.60× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.28× | 0.60× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.85× | 0.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.74× | 0.60× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.79× | 0.67× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.76× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $45.0M | $29.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $27.9M | $18.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.1% | 6.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.4% | 3.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-64.0M | $154.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $45.0M | $29.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.3M | $30.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-32.5M | $57.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.8M | $73.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.0M | $22.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.2M | $65.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.7M | $-13.7M |
| Q4 25 | $27.9M | $18.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.5M | $18.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-60.8M | $50.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-46.7M | $68.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.9M | $18.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-22.9M | $-20.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $57.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-46.8M | $-22.7M |
| Q4 25 | 7.1% | 6.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -16.0% | 17.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -12.5% | 25.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.7% | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.0% | -8.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 23.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.6% | -9.6% |
| Q4 25 | 4.4% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.9% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.4% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.9% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.2% | 3.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.6% | 3.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 12.67× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.08× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.31× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DNUT
Segment breakdown not available.
SYNA
| Enterprise And Automotive Product Applications | $161.1M | 53% |
| Internet Of Things Product Applications | $93.2M | 31% |
| Mobile Product Applications | $48.2M | 16% |
