vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Krispy Kreme, Inc. (DNUT) and TRIMAS CORP (TRS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Krispy Kreme, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($392.4M vs $256.5M, roughly 1.5× TRIMAS CORP). TRIMAS CORP runs the higher net margin — 31.9% vs -7.1%, a 38.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TRIMAS CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.8% vs -2.9%). TRIMAS CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($36.8M vs $27.9M). Over the past eight quarters, TRIMAS CORP's revenue compounded faster (3.3% CAGR vs -5.9%).
Krispy Kreme, Inc. is an American multinational doughnut company and coffeehouse chain. Krispy Kreme was founded by Vernon Rudolph (1915–1973), who bought a yeast-raised recipe from a New Orleans chef, rented a building in 1937 in what is now historic Old Salem in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, and began selling to local grocery stores. Steady growth preceded an ambitious expansion as a public company in the period 2000 to 2016, which ultimately proved unprofitable. In 2016, the company retur...
Trimas Corp is a diversified industrial manufacturing enterprise that designs, produces and distributes a wide portfolio of engineered products, including specialized fasteners, aerospace components, custom packaging solutions, and consumer & industrial hardware. It primarily serves aerospace, automotive, construction, consumer goods and industrial sectors, with core operations across North America and selected global markets.
DNUT vs TRS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $392.4M | $256.5M |
| Net Profit | $-27.8M | $81.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 12.8% |
| Operating Margin | -1.9% | 5.7% |
| Net Margin | -7.1% | 31.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.9% | 3.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -23.8% | 236.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.18 | $2.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $256.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $392.4M | $-140.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $375.3M | $269.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $379.8M | $274.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $375.2M | $241.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $404.0M | $-66.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $379.9M | $229.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $438.8M | $240.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $81.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-27.8M | $81.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-19.4M | $9.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-435.3M | $16.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-33.3M | $12.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-22.4M | $5.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.6M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.5M | $10.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 12.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 14.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.9% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -114.4% | 9.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.4% | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.2% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | 7.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 31.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | -7.1% | -58.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.2% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -114.6% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.9% | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.6% | -8.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.4% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.3% | 4.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.03 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.18 | $2.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.55 | $0.41 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.20 | $0.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.13 | $0.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.23 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | $0.27 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $42.4M | $30.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $911.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $650.1M | $705.6M |
| Total Assets | $2.6B | $1.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.40× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $30.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $42.4M | $30.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.7M | $33.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.3M | $30.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.7M | $32.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | $23.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.4M | $26.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.6M | $35.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $911.9M | $469.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $906.2M | $407.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $889.4M | $424.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $935.0M | $434.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $844.5M | $398.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $804.6M | $409.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $895.0M | $427.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $705.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $650.1M | $705.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $670.3M | $725.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $693.6M | $715.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $686.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $667.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $682.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $675.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.40× | 0.66× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.35× | 0.56× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.28× | 0.59× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.85× | 0.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.74× | 0.60× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | 0.60× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.79× | 0.63× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $45.0M | $117.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $27.9M | $36.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.1% | 14.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.4% | 18.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.44× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-64.0M | $109.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $117.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $45.0M | $41.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.3M | $36.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-32.5M | $30.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.8M | $9.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.0M | $27.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $22.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.2M | $18.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $36.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $27.9M | $36.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.5M | $22.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-60.8M | $13.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-46.7M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.9M | $12.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-22.9M | $10.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $7.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | 14.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.1% | -26.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -16.0% | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -12.5% | -1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.7% | -18.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.0% | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 3.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 18.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.4% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.9% | 5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.4% | -22.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.9% | 5.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.2% | 4.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.44× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.92× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.80× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.08× | 8.71× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.68× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
