vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Krispy Kreme, Inc. (DNUT) and Verisign (VRSN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Verisign is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($425.3M vs $392.4M, roughly 1.1× Krispy Kreme, Inc.). Verisign runs the higher net margin — 48.5% vs -7.1%, a 55.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Verisign posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.6% vs -2.9%). Verisign produced more free cash flow last quarter ($285.1M vs $27.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Verisign's revenue compounded faster (5.2% CAGR vs -5.9%).
Krispy Kreme, Inc. is an American multinational doughnut company and coffeehouse chain. Krispy Kreme was founded by Vernon Rudolph (1915–1973), who bought a yeast-raised recipe from a New Orleans chef, rented a building in 1937 in what is now historic Old Salem in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, and began selling to local grocery stores. Steady growth preceded an ambitious expansion as a public company in the period 2000 to 2016, which ultimately proved unprofitable. In 2016, the company retur...
Verisign, Inc. is an American company based in Reston, Virginia, that operates a diverse array of network infrastructure, including two of the Internet's thirteen root nameservers, the authoritative registry for the .com, .net, and .name generic top-level domains and the .cc country-code top-level domains, and the back-end systems for the .jobs and .edu sponsored top-level domains.
DNUT vs VRSN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $392.4M | $425.3M |
| Net Profit | $-27.8M | $206.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 88.5% |
| Operating Margin | -1.9% | 67.0% |
| Net Margin | -7.1% | 48.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.9% | 7.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -23.8% | 7.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.18 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $392.4M | $425.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $375.3M | $419.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $379.8M | $409.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $375.2M | $402.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $404.0M | $395.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $379.9M | $390.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $438.8M | $387.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $442.7M | $384.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-27.8M | $206.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-19.4M | $212.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-435.3M | $207.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-33.3M | $199.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-22.4M | $191.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.6M | $201.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.5M | $198.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.5M | $194.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 88.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 88.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 88.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 87.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 87.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 88.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 87.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 87.2% |
| Q4 25 | -1.9% | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.9% | 67.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -114.4% | 68.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.4% | 67.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.8% | 66.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.2% | 68.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | 68.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.7% | 67.4% |
| Q4 25 | -7.1% | 48.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.2% | 50.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -114.6% | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.9% | 49.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.6% | 48.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.4% | 51.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.3% | 51.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.9% | 50.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.18 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.55 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.20 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.13 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.23 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.05 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $42.4M | $580.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $911.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $650.1M | $-2.2B |
| Total Assets | $2.6B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.40× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $42.4M | $580.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.7M | $617.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.3M | $593.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.7M | $648.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | $599.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.4M | $644.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.6M | $689.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.1M | $924.7M |
| Q4 25 | $911.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $906.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $889.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $935.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $844.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $804.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $895.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $881.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $650.1M | $-2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $670.3M | $-2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $693.6M | $-2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $-2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $-2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $-1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $-1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $-1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.2B | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.35× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.28× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.85× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.79× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.76× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $45.0M | $289.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $27.9M | $285.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.1% | 67.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.4% | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.40× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-64.0M | $1.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $45.0M | $289.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.3M | $307.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-32.5M | $202.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.8M | $291.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.0M | $231.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $253.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.2M | $160.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.7M | $257.3M |
| Q4 25 | $27.9M | $285.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.5M | $303.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-60.8M | $194.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-46.7M | $285.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.9M | $222.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-22.9M | $247.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $151.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-46.8M | $253.5M |
| Q4 25 | 7.1% | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 72.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -16.0% | 47.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -12.5% | 71.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.7% | 56.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.0% | 63.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 39.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.6% | 66.0% |
| Q4 25 | 4.4% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.9% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.4% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.9% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.2% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.6% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.08× | 1.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.81× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.33× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
