vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Krispy Kreme, Inc. (DNUT) and OLYMPIC STEEL INC (ZEUS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OLYMPIC STEEL INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($490.7M vs $392.4M, roughly 1.3× Krispy Kreme, Inc.). OLYMPIC STEEL INC runs the higher net margin — 0.4% vs -7.1%, a 7.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, OLYMPIC STEEL INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.4% vs -2.9%). Krispy Kreme, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($27.9M vs $-12.9M). Over the past eight quarters, OLYMPIC STEEL INC's revenue compounded faster (0.1% CAGR vs -5.9%).
Krispy Kreme, Inc. is an American multinational doughnut company and coffeehouse chain. Krispy Kreme was founded by Vernon Rudolph (1915–1973), who bought a yeast-raised recipe from a New Orleans chef, rented a building in 1937 in what is now historic Old Salem in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, and began selling to local grocery stores. Steady growth preceded an ambitious expansion as a public company in the period 2000 to 2016, which ultimately proved unprofitable. In 2016, the company retur...
Olympic Steel, Inc. is a metals service center based in Cleveland, Ohio. The company processes and distributes carbon, coated and stainless flat-rolled sheet, coil and plate steel, aluminium alloy, tin plate, and metal-intensive branded products primarily in the United States. Metals processing and value added services include tempering, stretch leveling, cutting-to-length, slitting, edging, shearing, blanking, burning, forming, shot blasting, laser punching, plate rolling, fabricating, machi...
DNUT vs ZEUS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $392.4M | $490.7M |
| Net Profit | $-27.8M | $2.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -1.9% | 1.5% |
| Net Margin | -7.1% | 0.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.9% | 4.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -23.8% | -21.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.18 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $392.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $375.3M | $490.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $379.8M | $496.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $375.2M | $492.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $404.0M | $418.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $379.9M | $470.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $438.8M | $526.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $442.7M | $526.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-27.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-19.4M | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-435.3M | $5.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-33.3M | $2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-22.4M | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.6M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.5M | $7.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.5M | $8.7M |
| Q4 25 | -1.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.9% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -114.4% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.4% | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.8% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.2% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.7% | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | -7.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.2% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -114.6% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.9% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.6% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.4% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.9% | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.18 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.18 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.55 | $0.45 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.20 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.13 | $0.33 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.23 | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | $0.66 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.05 | $0.75 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $42.4M | $7.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $911.9M | $240.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $650.1M | $579.1M |
| Total Assets | $2.6B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.40× | 0.42× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $42.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.7M | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.3M | $14.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.7M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.4M | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.6M | $9.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.1M | $10.3M |
| Q4 25 | $911.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $906.2M | $240.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $889.4M | $233.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $935.0M | $235.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $844.5M | $272.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $804.6M | $197.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $895.0M | $209.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $881.8M | $196.8M |
| Q4 25 | $650.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $670.3M | $579.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $693.6M | $578.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $574.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $573.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $570.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $569.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $563.0M |
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.2B | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.35× | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.28× | 0.40× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.85× | 0.41× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.74× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | 0.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.79× | 0.37× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.76× | 0.35× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $45.0M | $-5.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $27.9M | $-12.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.1% | -2.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.4% | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -2.50× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-64.0M | $41.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $45.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.3M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-32.5M | $15.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.8M | $49.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.0M | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $24.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.2M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.7M | $-2.6M |
| Q4 25 | $27.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.5M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-60.8M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-46.7M | $40.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.9M | $7.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-22.9M | $15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $-11.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-46.8M | $-7.4M |
| Q4 25 | 7.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | -2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -16.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -12.5% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.7% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.0% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | -2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.6% | -1.4% |
| Q4 25 | 4.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.9% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.2% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.6% | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -2.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.96× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 19.70× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.08× | 9.01× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.38× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.30× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DNUT
Segment breakdown not available.
ZEUS
| Carbon Flat Products | $268.2M | 55% |
| Specialty Metals Flat Products | $140.9M | 29% |
| Tubular And Pipe Products | $81.6M | 17% |
