vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dominari Holdings Inc. (DOMH) and Firefly Aerospace Inc. (FLY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Firefly Aerospace Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($30.8M vs $30.1M, roughly 1.0× Dominari Holdings Inc.). Firefly Aerospace Inc. runs the higher net margin — -433.5% vs -438.1%, a 4.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dominari Holdings Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (220.4% vs 37.6%).
Firefly Aerospace, Inc. (Firefly) is an American aerospace firm based in Cedar Park, Texas. Firefly develops small- and medium-lift launch vehicles for commercial launches to orbit. Firefly's stated purpose is to increase access to space, similar to other private spaceflight companies.
DOMH vs FLY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $30.1M | $30.8M |
| Net Profit | $-131.8M | $-133.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 27.6% |
| Operating Margin | -8.9% | -202.1% |
| Net Margin | -438.1% | -433.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 220.4% | 37.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -12426.2% | -227.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-6.94 | $-1.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $30.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.8M | $30.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.1M | $15.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0M | $22.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2M | $21.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-131.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $125.2M | $-133.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.6M | $-63.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-32.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.2M | $-40.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.1M | $-53.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 27.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 25.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 34.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 14.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -8.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.1% | -202.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -57.0% | -349.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -394.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -79.1% | -152.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -44.3% | -232.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -205.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | -438.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 246.4% | -433.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 48.7% | -410.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -400.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -104.2% | -182.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -99.1% | -253.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -398.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-6.94 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.27 | $-1.50 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.12 | $-5.78 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.02 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.21 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.67 | $-3.57 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.01 | $-4.60 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.91 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $80.5M | $995.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $69.4M | $948.8M |
| Total Assets | $112.9M | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $80.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $176.2M | $995.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.2M | $205.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | $26.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.1M | $21.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $136.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $69.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $210.2M | $948.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $88.6M | $-918.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $39.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.3M | $-665.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.4M | $-620.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $47.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $112.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $109.3M | $466.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $52.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $52.2M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $22.7M | $-53.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-62.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -201.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 29.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $22.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.9M | $-53.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-353.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-62.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -201.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 29.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.04× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.02× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -15.65× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DOMH
| Chief Operating Decision Maker | $30.1M | 100% |
| Commissions | $458.0K | 2% |
FLY
| Spacecraft Solutions Revenue | $21.4M | 69% |
| Launch Revenue | $9.4M | 31% |
