vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dominari Holdings Inc. (DOMH) and Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dominari Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($30.1M vs $26.9M, roughly 1.1× Hyperscale Data, Inc.). Hyperscale Data, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -112.0% vs -438.1%, a 326.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dominari Holdings Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (220.4% vs 38.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Dominari Holdings Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (369.1% CAGR vs -16.3%).
Hyperscale Data, Inc. provides GPU-accelerated computing infrastructure and cloud solutions tailored for AI development, big data processing, and high-performance computing workloads. It primarily serves AI startups, large technology firms, and cloud service providers across North America and the Asia-Pacific region, delivering scalable, high-efficiency computing resources to support complex data processing needs.
DOMH vs GPUS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $30.1M | $26.9M |
| Net Profit | $-131.8M | $-30.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 14.5% |
| Operating Margin | -8.9% | -117.8% |
| Net Margin | -438.1% | -112.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 220.4% | 38.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -12426.2% | -6670.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-6.94 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $30.1M | $26.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.8M | $24.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.1M | $25.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.1M | $25.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.4M | $19.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0M | $31.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2M | $17.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4M | $38.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-131.8M | $-30.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $125.2M | $-13.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.6M | $-19.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-32.5M | $-4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1M | $-445.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.2M | $-25.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.1M | $-33.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.4M | $3.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 23.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 27.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -21.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 47.4% |
| Q4 25 | -8.9% | -117.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.1% | -57.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -57.0% | -39.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -394.6% | -25.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | -46.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -79.1% | -79.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -44.3% | -151.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -205.2% | 9.5% |
| Q4 25 | -438.1% | -112.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 246.4% | -53.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 48.7% | -73.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -400.5% | -16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.4% | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -104.2% | -82.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -99.1% | -190.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -398.0% | 9.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-6.94 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.27 | $-0.39 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.12 | $-2.66 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.02 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.21 | $-8.78 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.67 | $-24.82 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.01 | $-37.81 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.91 | $3.32 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $80.5M | $13.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $83.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $69.4M | $119.8M |
| Total Assets | $112.9M | $313.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.69× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $80.5M | $13.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $176.2M | $24.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.2M | $5.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.9M | $4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.2M | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.1M | $9.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1M | $18.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $83.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $80.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $88.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $92.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $96.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $104.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $106.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $30.0M |
| Q4 25 | $69.4M | $119.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $210.2M | $55.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $88.6M | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.4M | $6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $39.9M | $8.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.3M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.4M | $26.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $47.7M | $59.0M |
| Q4 25 | $112.9M | $313.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.4M | $242.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $109.3M | $213.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $52.3M | $218.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.1M | $220.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.4M | $231.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.1M | $270.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $52.2M | $299.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.19× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 38.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.00× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.51× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $22.7M | $-37.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-56.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -208.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 68.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-87.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $22.7M | $-37.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.9M | $-17.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-353.0K | $-3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.7M | $-9.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.7M | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.6M | $-10.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-56.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-20.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-9.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-5.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-11.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | -208.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -84.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -13.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -27.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -47.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -33.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -30.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 68.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 12.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.04× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.02× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -15.65× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -2.75× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DOMH
| Chief Operating Decision Maker | $30.1M | 100% |
| Commissions | $458.0K | 2% |
GPUS
| Transferred Over Time | $10.4M | 39% |
| Revenue From Mined Crypto Assets At Sentinum Owned And Operated Facilities | $5.8M | 21% |
| Hotel And Real Estate Operations | $4.8M | 18% |
| Other | $4.0M | 15% |
| Turn On Green | $2.0M | 7% |