vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dominari Holdings Inc. (DOMH) and SolarMax Technology, Inc. (SMXT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SolarMax Technology, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($46.6M vs $30.1M, roughly 1.5× Dominari Holdings Inc.). SolarMax Technology, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -1.9% vs -438.1%, a 436.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SolarMax Technology, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (623.5% vs 220.4%).
SolarMax Technology, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells high-efficiency solar PV modules and clean energy systems. It serves residential, commercial and industrial clients in North America and key Asia-Pacific markets, offering installation and after-sales support to boost low-carbon energy use.
DOMH vs SMXT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $30.1M | $46.6M |
| Net Profit | $-131.8M | $-872.2K |
| Gross Margin | — | 2.7% |
| Operating Margin | -8.9% | -2.7% |
| Net Margin | -438.1% | -1.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 220.4% | 623.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -12426.2% | 77.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-6.94 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $30.1M | $46.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.8M | $30.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.1M | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.1M | $6.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.4M | $6.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-131.8M | $-872.2K | ||
| Q3 25 | $125.2M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.6M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-32.5M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.2M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 19.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -8.9% | -2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.1% | -6.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -57.0% | -25.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -394.6% | -16.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | -27.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -79.1% | -158.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -44.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -205.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | -438.1% | -1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 246.4% | -7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 48.7% | -27.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -400.5% | -18.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.4% | -60.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -104.2% | -152.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -99.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -398.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-6.94 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.27 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.12 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.02 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.21 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.67 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.01 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.91 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $80.5M | $8.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $69.4M | $-12.2M |
| Total Assets | $112.9M | $91.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $80.5M | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $176.2M | $5.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.2M | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.9M | $6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.2M | $7.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $69.4M | $-12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $210.2M | $-11.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $88.6M | $-15.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.4M | $-15.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $39.9M | $-15.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.3M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $47.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $112.9M | $91.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.4M | $58.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $109.3M | $38.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $52.3M | $38.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.1M | $38.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.4M | $43.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $52.2M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $22.7M | $-2.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $22.7M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.9M | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-353.0K | $220.7K | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $-601.1K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.7M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.7M | $203.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.04× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.02× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -15.65× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DOMH
| Chief Operating Decision Maker | $30.1M | 100% |
| Commissions | $458.0K | 2% |
SMXT
| Yabucoa | $35.9M | 77% |
| Other | $10.7M | 23% |
