vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DOMO, INC. (DOMO) and Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. (EOSE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DOMO, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($79.4M vs $58.0M, roughly 1.4× Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc.). DOMO, INC. runs the higher net margin — -13.1% vs -207.7%, a 194.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (699.6% vs -0.5%). DOMO, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.1M vs $-75.2M).
Domo, Inc. is an American cloud software company based in American Fork, Utah, United States. It specializes in artificial intelligence, business intelligence, and data visualization and is designed to provide real-time access to business data for decision makers across the company with minimal IT involvement. It is a Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) venture.
Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. is an energy storage solutions provider that designs, produces and deploys safe long-duration zinc-based battery systems. It serves utility, commercial, industrial and microgrid customers across North America, Europe and Asia, supporting grid stability and renewable energy integration.
DOMO vs EOSE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $79.4M | $58.0M |
| Net Profit | $-10.4M | $-120.5M |
| Gross Margin | 74.2% | -93.8% |
| Operating Margin | -8.7% | -140.1% |
| Net Margin | -13.1% | -207.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.5% | 699.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 44.6% | 55.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.25 | $-0.53 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $79.4M | $58.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $79.7M | $30.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $80.1M | $15.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $78.8M | $10.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $79.8M | $7.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $80.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $80.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-10.4M | $-120.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-22.9M | $-641.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-18.1M | $-222.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-17.7M | $15.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.8M | $-268.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-19.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-26.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-18.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | 74.2% | -93.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 74.8% | -111.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 74.2% | -203.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 74.4% | -234.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 75.0% | -324.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 74.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 74.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 76.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | -8.7% | -140.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.1% | -200.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -17.9% | -419.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -15.6% | -506.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -13.9% | -712.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -18.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -26.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -16.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | -13.1% | -207.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -28.8% | -2102.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -22.5% | -1463.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -22.4% | 144.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -23.5% | -3696.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -24.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -32.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.25 | $-0.53 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.56 | $-4.91 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.45 | $-1.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.45 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.48 | $-2.30 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.51 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.69 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.51 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $568.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $124.2M | $813.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-191.9M | $-2.2B |
| Total Assets | $201.6M | $885.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $568.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $58.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.2M | $120.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $45.3M | $82.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $74.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $61.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $60.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $124.2M | $813.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $121.9M | $448.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $119.7M | $445.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $117.7M | $325.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.6M | $316.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $114.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $113.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-191.9M | $-2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-191.5M | $-2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-178.7M | $-1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-177.2M | $-942.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-171.2M | $-1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-166.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-163.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-153.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $201.6M | $885.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $195.7M | $328.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $189.7M | $361.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $214.3M | $263.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $190.2M | $260.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $197.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $204.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $225.7M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.4M | $-50.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.1M | $-75.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.4% | -129.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.9% | 43.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $9.9M | $-265.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.4M | $-50.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4M | $-65.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0M | $-66.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.9M | $-28.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.7M | $-42.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.1M | $-75.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0M | $-82.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0M | $-73.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.7M | $-33.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.2M | $-55.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-625.0K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | -129.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | -271.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | -480.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.5% | -323.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -20.3% | -769.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.9% | 43.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 55.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 46.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 47.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.2% | 180.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.91× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DOMO
| Subscription | $71.9M | 91% |
| Professional Servicesand Other | $7.5M | 9% |
EOSE
Segment breakdown not available.
