vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DOMO, INC. (DOMO) and Hippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hippo Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($120.4M vs $79.4M, roughly 1.5× DOMO, INC.). Hippo Holdings Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.0% vs -13.1%, a 18.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Hippo Holdings Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.2% vs -0.5%). Hippo Holdings Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($9.1M vs $1.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Hippo Holdings Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (18.9% CAGR vs -0.5%).
Domo, Inc. is an American cloud software company based in American Fork, Utah, United States. It specializes in artificial intelligence, business intelligence, and data visualization and is designed to provide real-time access to business data for decision makers across the company with minimal IT involvement. It is a Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) venture.
Hippo Valley Estate is a sugar estate found near the town of Chiredzi in Chiredzi District of southeastern Zimbabwe, on the Runde River near the border with Mozambique.
DOMO vs HIPO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $79.4M | $120.4M |
| Net Profit | $-10.4M | $6.0M |
| Gross Margin | 74.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | -8.7% | 5.6% |
| Net Margin | -13.1% | 5.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.5% | 18.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 44.6% | -86.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.25 | $0.31 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $79.4M | $120.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $79.7M | $120.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $80.1M | $117.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $78.8M | $110.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $79.8M | $101.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.4M | $95.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $80.1M | $89.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $80.2M | $85.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-10.4M | $6.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-22.9M | $98.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-18.1M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-17.7M | $-47.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.8M | $44.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-19.5M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-26.0M | $-40.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-18.7M | $-35.7M |
| Q4 25 | 74.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 74.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 74.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 74.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 75.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 74.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 74.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 76.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | -8.7% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.1% | 81.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -17.9% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -15.6% | -41.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -13.9% | 46.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -18.5% | -5.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -26.8% | -40.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -16.6% | -38.7% |
| Q4 25 | -13.1% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -28.8% | 81.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -22.5% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -22.4% | -43.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -23.5% | 43.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -24.9% | -8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -32.5% | -45.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.3% | -42.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.25 | $0.31 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.56 | $3.77 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.45 | $0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.45 | $-1.91 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.48 | $1.81 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.51 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.69 | $-1.64 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.51 | $-1.47 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $218.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $124.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-191.9M | $436.1M |
| Total Assets | $201.6M | $1.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $218.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $247.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.2M | $198.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $45.3M | $140.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $197.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $191.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $61.2M | $175.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $60.9M | $223.4M |
| Q4 25 | $124.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $121.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $119.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $117.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $114.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $113.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-191.9M | $436.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-191.5M | $421.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-178.7M | $332.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-177.2M | $322.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-171.2M | $362.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-166.4M | $326.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-163.5M | $322.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-153.5M | $351.2M |
| Q4 25 | $201.6M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $195.7M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $189.7M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $214.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $190.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $197.8M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $204.4M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $225.7M | $1.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.4M | $9.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.1M | $9.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.4% | 7.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.9% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.53× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $9.9M | $14.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.4M | $9.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4M | $16.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0M | $24.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.9M | $-35.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.7M | $47.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.2M | $46.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9M | $-10.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.4M | $17.7M |
| Q4 25 | $1.1M | $9.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0M | $16.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0M | $24.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.7M | $-35.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.2M | $47.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-625.0K | $-10.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9M | $17.6M |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.5% | -32.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -20.3% | 46.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.8% | -11.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.6% | 20.7% |
| Q4 25 | 2.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.2% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.8% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.1% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.53× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 19.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DOMO
| Subscription | $71.9M | 91% |
| Professional Servicesand Other | $7.5M | 9% |
HIPO
Segment breakdown not available.