vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DOMO, INC. (DOMO) and PEAPACK GLADSTONE FINANCIAL CORP (PGC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DOMO, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($79.4M vs $78.2M, roughly 1.0× PEAPACK GLADSTONE FINANCIAL CORP). PEAPACK GLADSTONE FINANCIAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 15.5% vs -13.1%, a 28.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PEAPACK GLADSTONE FINANCIAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (26.5% vs -0.5%). PEAPACK GLADSTONE FINANCIAL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($28.8M vs $1.1M). Over the past eight quarters, PEAPACK GLADSTONE FINANCIAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (21.4% CAGR vs -0.5%).
Domo, Inc. is an American cloud software company based in American Fork, Utah, United States. It specializes in artificial intelligence, business intelligence, and data visualization and is designed to provide real-time access to business data for decision makers across the company with minimal IT involvement. It is a Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) venture.
Peapack Gladstone Financial Corp is a U.S.-based regional financial holding company that provides commercial and consumer banking, wealth management, private banking, lending solutions, and trust services, primarily serving individual and small-to-medium business clients across New Jersey and the surrounding U.S. Northeast region.
DOMO vs PGC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $79.4M | $78.2M |
| Net Profit | $-10.4M | $12.2M |
| Gross Margin | 74.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | -8.7% | 21.7% |
| Net Margin | -13.1% | 15.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.5% | 26.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 44.6% | 31.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.25 | $0.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $79.4M | $78.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $79.7M | $70.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $80.1M | $69.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $78.8M | $64.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $79.8M | $61.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.4M | $56.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $80.1M | $56.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $80.2M | $53.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-10.4M | $12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-22.9M | $9.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-18.1M | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-17.7M | $7.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.8M | $9.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-19.5M | $7.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-26.0M | $7.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-18.7M | $8.6M |
| Q4 25 | 74.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 74.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 74.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 74.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 75.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 74.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 74.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 76.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | -8.7% | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.1% | 19.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -17.9% | 16.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -15.6% | 16.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -13.9% | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -18.5% | 19.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -26.8% | 16.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -16.6% | 23.4% |
| Q4 25 | -13.1% | 15.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -28.8% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -22.5% | 11.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -22.4% | 11.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -23.5% | 14.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -24.9% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -32.5% | 13.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.3% | 16.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.25 | $0.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.56 | $0.54 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.45 | $0.45 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.45 | $0.43 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.48 | $0.52 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.51 | $0.43 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.69 | $0.42 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.51 | $0.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $124.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-191.9M | $658.2M |
| Total Assets | $201.6M | $7.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $45.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $61.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $60.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $124.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $121.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $119.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $117.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $114.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $113.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-191.9M | $658.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-191.5M | $642.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-178.7M | $629.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-177.2M | $621.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-171.2M | $605.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-166.4M | $607.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-163.5M | $588.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-153.5M | $582.4M |
| Q4 25 | $201.6M | $7.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $195.7M | $7.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $189.7M | $7.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $214.3M | $7.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $190.2M | $7.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $197.8M | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $204.4M | $6.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $225.7M | $6.4B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.4M | $43.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.1M | $28.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.4% | 36.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.9% | 18.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.55× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $9.9M | $61.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.4M | $43.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4M | $36.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0M | $15.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.9M | $-7.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.7M | $71.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.2M | $24.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9M | $852.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.4M | $19.1M |
| Q4 25 | $1.1M | $28.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0M | $34.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0M | $9.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.7M | $-11.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.2M | $63.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.4M | $23.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-625.0K | $-431.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9M | $18.0M |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 36.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | 48.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 14.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.5% | -17.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -20.3% | 101.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.7% | 40.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.8% | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.6% | 33.9% |
| Q4 25 | 2.9% | 18.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 5.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.2% | 13.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.8% | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.1% | 2.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.55× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.76× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.01× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.04× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.70× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.25× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.21× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DOMO
| Subscription | $71.9M | 91% |
| Professional Servicesand Other | $7.5M | 9% |
PGC
| Banking Segment | $61.4M | 79% |
| Wealth Management Division | $13.9M | 18% |
| Other | $2.9M | 4% |
