vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Douglas Elliman Inc. (DOUG) and IMAX CORP (IMAX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Douglas Elliman Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($245.4M vs $125.2M, roughly 2.0× IMAX CORP). Douglas Elliman Inc. runs the higher net margin — 27.9% vs 0.5%, a 27.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, IMAX CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (35.1% vs 0.9%). IMAX CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($28.0M vs $-14.7M). Over the past eight quarters, IMAX CORP's revenue compounded faster (25.8% CAGR vs 10.7%).
Douglas Elliman Inc. is a leading U.S.-based residential real estate brokerage firm. It offers luxury property sales, rentals, property management, and advisory solutions, serving high-net-worth clients across key metro markets including New York, California, Florida, and Texas.
IMAX Corporation is a Canadian production theatre company which designs and manufactures IMAX cameras and projection systems as well as performing film development, production, post-production and distribution to IMAX-affiliated theatres worldwide. Founded in Montreal in 1967, it has headquarters in the Toronto area, and operations in New York City and Los Angeles.
DOUG vs IMAX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $245.4M | $125.2M |
| Net Profit | $68.6M | $637.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 57.6% |
| Operating Margin | 27.3% | 19.3% |
| Net Margin | 27.9% | 0.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.9% | 35.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 1243.4% | -88.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.80 | $0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $245.4M | $125.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $262.8M | $106.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $271.4M | $91.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $253.4M | $86.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $243.3M | $92.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $266.3M | $91.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $285.8M | $89.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $200.2M | $79.1M |
| Q4 25 | $68.6M | $637.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-24.7M | $20.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-22.7M | $11.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.0M | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.0M | $5.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-27.2M | $13.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.7M | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-41.5M | $3.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 57.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 63.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 58.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 61.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 52.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 55.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 49.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 59.3% |
| Q4 25 | 27.3% | 19.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.1% | 27.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.0% | 15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.1% | 19.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.7% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.8% | 21.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.3% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -20.7% | 15.3% |
| Q4 25 | 27.9% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.4% | 19.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -8.4% | 12.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.4% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.5% | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.2% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.6% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -20.7% | 4.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.80 | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.29 | $0.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.27 | $0.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.07 | $0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.06 | $0.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.33 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.02 | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.50 | $0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $115.5M | $151.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $183.9M | $337.9M |
| Total Assets | $444.4M | $894.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $115.5M | $151.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $143.0M | $143.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $136.3M | $109.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $136.8M | $97.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $145.5M | $100.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $151.4M | $104.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.9M | $91.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $91.5M | $81.0M |
| Q4 25 | $183.9M | $337.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $115.1M | $349.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $137.6M | $320.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $158.2M | $299.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.2M | $299.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $173.6M | $289.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $196.9M | $267.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $195.1M | $258.8M |
| Q4 25 | $444.4M | $894.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $480.6M | $889.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $489.0M | $868.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $493.9M | $848.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $493.9M | $830.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $502.7M | $847.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $463.9M | $827.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $461.1M | $824.1M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-14.4M | $29.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-14.7M | $28.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -6.0% | 22.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.21× | 46.11× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-17.2M | $118.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-14.4M | $29.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5M | $67.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $642.0K | $23.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.6M | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.0M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.0M | $35.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | $35.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-27.3M | $-11.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-14.7M | $28.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | $64.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-575.0K | $20.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.7M | $5.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-10.2M | $6.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.7M | $34.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $432.0K | $33.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-29.4M | $-12.1M |
| Q4 25 | -6.0% | 22.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 60.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.2% | 22.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.6% | 6.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.2% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.9% | 37.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 37.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -14.7% | -15.3% |
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.0% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | -0.21× | 46.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.99× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.54× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.78× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -3.35× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DOUG
| Commissions And Other Brokerage Income | $240.3M | 98% |
| Property Management Income | $2.8M | 1% |
| Property Management | $2.2M | 1% |
IMAX
| Technology Sales | $46.6M | 37% |
| Image Enhancement And Maintenance Services | $38.1M | 30% |
| Joint Revenue Sharing Arrangement | $20.4M | 16% |
| Maintenance | $16.3M | 13% |
| Finance Income | $2.8M | 2% |
| Other Content Solutions | $1.6M | 1% |
