vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dover Corporation (DOV) and SLM Corp (SLM), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dover Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.1B vs $377.1M, roughly 5.6× SLM Corp). SLM Corp runs the higher net margin — 13.4% vs 61.8%, a 48.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dover Corporation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.5% vs 4.1%). Over the past eight quarters, SLM Corp's revenue compounded faster (-1.3% CAGR vs -1.8%).
Dover Corporation is an American conglomerate manufacturer of industrial products. The Downers Grove, Illinois-based company was founded in 1955. As of 2021, Dover's business was divided into five segments: Engineered Products, Clean Energy and Fueling, Imaging & Identification, Pumps & Process Solutions and Climate and Sustainability Technologies. Dover is a constituent of the S&P 500 index and trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol DOV. Dover was ranked 448 in the 2024 Fortu...
Nikon SLM Solutions AG, headquartered in Lübeck, Germany, is a manufacturer of 3D metal printers listed on the stock market and co-owner of the word mark SLM. The shares of SLM Solutions Group AG have been listed in Prime Standard of the Frankfurt Stock Exchange since May 9, 2014.
DOV vs SLM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 2026 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.1B | $377.1M |
| Net Profit | $282.1M | $233.2M |
| Gross Margin | 39.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 16.5% | 83.8% |
| Net Margin | 13.4% | 61.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.5% | 4.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 22.2% | 109.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.06 | $1.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $377.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $373.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $376.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $375.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $362.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $359.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $372.2M |
| Q1 26 | $282.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $282.1M | $233.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $302.0M | $135.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $279.1M | $71.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $230.8M | $304.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $111.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $347.1M | $-45.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $281.8M | $252.0M |
| Q1 26 | 39.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 39.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 40.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 40.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | 16.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.5% | 83.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.2% | 49.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.3% | 23.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.0% | 36.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.8% | -16.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.0% | 91.0% |
| Q1 26 | 13.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.4% | 61.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.5% | 36.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.6% | 18.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.4% | 81.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 96.4% | 30.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.5% | -12.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.9% | 67.7% |
| Q1 26 | $2.06 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.06 | $1.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.19 | $0.63 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.02 | $0.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.67 | $1.40 | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.38 | $0.53 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.51 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.04 | $1.11 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $4.2B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.3B | $5.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.4B | $2.5B |
| Total Assets | $13.4B | $29.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.45× | 2.19× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.3B |
| Q1 26 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1B | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | $6.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $6.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $6.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $6.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | $5.4B |
| Q1 26 | $7.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.4B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.7B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.7B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.4B | $2.3B |
| Q1 26 | $13.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.4B | $29.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.4B | $29.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.2B | $29.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.6B | $28.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.5B | $30.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.9B | $30.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.3B | $28.8B |
| Q1 26 | 0.45× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.45× | 2.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.40× | 2.92× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.41× | 2.70× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.42× | 2.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.42× | 2.98× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.53× | 2.83× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.55× | 2.37× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-64.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | — | -0.28× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $543.9M | $-64.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $424.2M | $-49.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $212.3M | $-138.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $157.5M | $-146.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $439.0M | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $353.2M | $-113.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $203.7M | $-143.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $487.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $370.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $151.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $109.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $385.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $325.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $162.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.93× | -0.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.40× | -0.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.76× | -1.95× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.68× | -0.48× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.31× | 0.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.02× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.72× | -0.57× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
