vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SLM Corp (SLM) and TORO CO (TTC), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TORO CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $377.1M, roughly 3.0× SLM Corp). SLM Corp runs the higher net margin — 61.8% vs 4.7%, a 57.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SLM Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.1% vs -2.2%). Over the past eight quarters, TORO CO's revenue compounded faster (6.3% CAGR vs -1.3%).
Nikon SLM Solutions AG, headquartered in Lübeck, Germany, is a manufacturer of 3D metal printers listed on the stock market and co-owner of the word mark SLM. The shares of SLM Solutions Group AG have been listed in Prime Standard of the Frankfurt Stock Exchange since May 9, 2014.
The Toro Company is an American company based in the Minneapolis suburb of Bloomington, Minnesota, that designs, manufactures, and markets lawn mowers, snow blowers, and irrigation system supplies for commercial and residential, agricultural, and public sector uses.
SLM vs TTC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $377.1M | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $233.2M | $53.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 33.7% |
| Operating Margin | 83.8% | 5.7% |
| Net Margin | 61.8% | 4.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.1% | -2.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 109.0% | -55.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.11 | $0.54 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $377.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $373.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $376.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $375.0M | $995.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $362.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $359.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $372.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $387.0M | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | $233.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $135.8M | $53.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.3M | $136.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $304.5M | $52.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $111.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-45.2M | $119.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $252.0M | $144.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $289.9M | $64.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 33.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 33.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 33.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 34.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 34.4% |
| Q4 25 | 83.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 49.8% | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.3% | 13.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -16.6% | 12.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 91.0% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.8% |
| Q4 25 | 61.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.4% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.9% | 10.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 81.2% | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -12.6% | 10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 67.7% | 10.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 74.9% | 6.5% |
| Q4 25 | $1.11 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.63 | $0.54 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.32 | $1.37 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.40 | $0.52 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.53 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.23 | $1.14 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.11 | $1.38 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.27 | $0.62 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.2B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.4B | $1.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.5B | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $29.7B | $3.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.19× | 0.73× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $4.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.6B | — |
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.8B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.0B | $991.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.4B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.0B | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $29.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.6B | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.6B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.9B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.0B | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.8B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $28.3B | $3.8B |
| Q4 25 | 2.19× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.92× | 0.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.70× | 0.74× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.56× | 0.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.83× | 0.61× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.37× | 0.62× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.35× | 0.77× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-64.5M | $225.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $207.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 18.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | — | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | -0.28× | 4.22× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $-64.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-49.3M | $225.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-138.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-146.1M | $-48.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-113.4M | $194.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-143.8M | $227.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-76.7M | $-92.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $207.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-67.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $170.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $206.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-111.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -6.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 14.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -11.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | -0.28× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.36× | 4.22× | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.95× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.48× | -0.92× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.63× | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.57× | 1.57× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.26× | -1.42× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SLM
Segment breakdown not available.
TTC
| Equipment Products And Services | $815.7M | 72% |
| Residential Segment | $192.8M | 17% |
| Irrigation | $115.1M | 10% |
