vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMDOCS LTD (DOX) and Vulcan Materials Company (VMC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Vulcan Materials Company is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.8B vs $1.3B, roughly 1.4× AMDOCS LTD). AMDOCS LTD runs the higher net margin — 11.2% vs 9.4%, a 1.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Vulcan Materials Company posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.4% vs 1.1%). Over the past eight quarters, AMDOCS LTD's revenue compounded faster (4.5% CAGR vs -6.6%).
Amdocs Limited is a multinational telecommunications technology company headquartered in Chesterfield, Missouri. The company specializes in software and services for communications, media and financial services providers and digital enterprises. Amdocs was founded in 1982 and is publicly traded on the Nasdaq stock exchange.
Vulcan Materials Company is an American company based in Birmingham, Alabama. It is principally engaged in the production, distribution and sale of construction materials. Vulcan is the largest producer of construction materials, primarily gravel, crushed stone, and sand, and employs approximately 12,000 people at over 400 facilities. Vulcan serves 22 states, the District of Columbia, Mexico, Canada, Bahamas and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
DOX vs VMC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2024 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $1.8B |
| Net Profit | $140.3M | $165.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 24.1% |
| Operating Margin | 14.1% | 15.1% |
| Net Margin | 11.2% | 9.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.1% | 7.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -12.0% | 27.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.21 | $1.35 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $165.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $252.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $374.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $320.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $128.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $293.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $207.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $140.3M | $308.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 24.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 25.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 30.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 29.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 22.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 29.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 29.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 23.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 22.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.1% | 22.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.2% | 15.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.35 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.90 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.82 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.42 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.97 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.21 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.56 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.21 | $2.31 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $140.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $4.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $8.5B |
| Total Assets | — | $16.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.51× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $140.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $183.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $191.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $347.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $181.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $559.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $433.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $111.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $8.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $8.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $16.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $16.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $17.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $17.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $16.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $17.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $14.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $14.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.52× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.65× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.43× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $241.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.46× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $241.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $543.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $676.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $341.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $251.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $440.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $595.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $201.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $358.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $454.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $238.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $83.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $277.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $498.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 18.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.46× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.81× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.95× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.50× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.87× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.65× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
