vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Leonardo DRS, Inc. (DRS) and SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc (SSNC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.6B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.6× Leonardo DRS, Inc.). SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc runs the higher net margin — 13.7% vs 9.6%, a 4.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.8% vs 8.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (24.1% CAGR vs 6.5%).
Leonardo DRS, Inc. is a United States–based defense contractor. Originally founded as DRS Technologies, Inc. and traded on the NYSE, it was acquired by Leonardo’s predecessor Finmeccanica in 2008. Leonardo DRS provides advanced defense technologies and systems primarily to the U.S. military.
SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. is an American multinational holding company headquartered in Windsor, Connecticut, that sells software and software as a service to the financial services industry. The company has offices in the Americas, Europe, Asia, Africa and Australia.
DRS vs SSNC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $1.6B |
| Net Profit | $102.0M | $226.1M |
| Gross Margin | 25.4% | 48.7% |
| Operating Margin | 11.9% | 24.2% |
| Net Margin | 9.6% | 13.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.1% | 8.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 14.6% | 6.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.38 | $0.91 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $960.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $829.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $799.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $981.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $812.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $753.0M | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $226.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $102.0M | $193.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $72.0M | $210.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $54.0M | $180.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.0M | $213.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $89.0M | $248.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.0M | $164.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.0M | $190.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 48.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.4% | 47.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.1% | 47.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.8% | 48.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.7% | 49.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | 49.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.0% | 48.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.4% | 48.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.9% | 22.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | 23.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.4% | 22.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.4% | 23.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.2% | 23.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.2% | 22.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.3% | 22.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.6% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.5% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.5% | 11.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.3% | 14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.1% | 16.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.0% | 13.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.91 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.38 | $0.76 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.26 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.20 | $0.72 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.19 | $0.84 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.34 | $0.98 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.21 | $0.65 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.14 | $0.75 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $647.0M | $420.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $321.0M | $7.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $6.9B |
| Total Assets | $4.5B | $20.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.12× | 1.08× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $420.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $647.0M | $462.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $309.0M | $388.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $278.0M | $480.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $380.0M | $515.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $598.0M | $567.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $198.0M | $694.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $149.0M | $462.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $321.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $326.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $331.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $335.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $340.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $345.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $351.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $6.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $6.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $20.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.5B | $20.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.2B | $19.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | $19.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $20.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.2B | $19.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9B | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8B | $16.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.08× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.12× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.12× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.14× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.15× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $425.0M | $299.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $376.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 35.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.6% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.17× | 1.33× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $227.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $299.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $425.0M | $643.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $107.0M | $456.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-28.0M | $372.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-138.0M | $272.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $443.0M | $486.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $59.0M | $336.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.0M | $384.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $376.0M | $633.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $77.0M | $421.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-56.0M | $350.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-170.0M | $259.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $414.0M | $466.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.0M | $310.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $0 | $374.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 35.5% | 38.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.0% | 26.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.8% | 22.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -21.3% | 17.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 42.2% | 30.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | 21.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 25.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.6% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.4% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.5% | 0.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.17× | 3.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.49× | 2.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.52× | 2.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.76× | 1.28× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.98× | 1.96× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.04× | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.89× | 2.02× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DRS
Segment breakdown not available.
SSNC
| Technology-enabled services | $1.4B | 85% |
| License, maintenance and related | $239.8M | 15% |
