vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Distribution Solutions Group, Inc. (DSGR) and HUTCHMED (China) Ltd (HCM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Distribution Solutions Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($518.0M vs $270.8M, roughly 1.9× HUTCHMED (China) Ltd). Distribution Solutions Group, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 1.2% vs 0.7%, a 0.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Distribution Solutions Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.7% vs -16.5%). Distribution Solutions Group, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($32.9M vs $3.4M).
Univar Solutions Inc. is a global chemical and ingredients distributor and provider of value-added services.
HUTCHMED (China) LtdHCMEarnings & Financial Report
HUTCHMED (China) Ltd is a biopharmaceutical firm focused on discovering, developing and commercializing targeted and immunotherapies for oncology and immunological diseases. It operates across China and global markets, with multiple marketed oncology drugs and a robust pipeline of late-stage clinical candidates addressing unmet patient needs.
DSGR vs HCM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $518.0M | $270.8M |
| Net Profit | $6.5M | $2.0M |
| Gross Margin | 32.9% | 37.7% |
| Operating Margin | 4.6% | -13.2% |
| Net Margin | 1.2% | 0.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.7% | -16.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -70.6% | -83.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.14 | $0.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $270.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $518.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $502.4M | $277.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $478.0M | $324.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $480.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $468.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $439.5M | $305.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $416.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.0M | $455.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3M | $11.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-25.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9M | $25.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 37.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.3% | 48.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.5% | 41.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | -1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.2% | -5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | -9.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 163.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.14 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.11 | $0.52 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.07 | $0.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.55 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.46 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.04 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.11 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $69.2M | $1.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $665.5M | $93.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $653.9M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $1.8B | $1.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.02× | 0.08× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $69.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.4M | $836.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $66.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $46.8M | $802.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $73.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $93.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $665.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $675.0M | $93.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $712.4M | $82.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $693.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $704.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $573.7M | $82.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $535.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $653.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $649.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $636.7M | $759.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $640.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $680.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $653.3M | $740.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $654.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.08× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.02× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.04× | 0.08× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.12× | 0.11× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.08× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.88× | 0.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.82× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $38.4M | $8.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $32.9M | $3.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.3% | 1.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.1% | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.95× | 4.21× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $92.2M | $-96.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $8.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.3M | $-72.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.8M | $40.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-17.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.4M | $-39.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.7M | $-82.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.4M | $32.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-20.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.0M | $-49.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.7% | -29.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.2% | 10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.1% | -16.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.95× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.66× | -0.16× | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.46× | 3.38× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.79× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.28× | -1.54× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DSGR
| Test Equity Segment | $206.5M | 40% |
| Gexpro Services Segment | $130.5M | 25% |
| Lawson Segment | $121.5M | 23% |
| Canada Branch Division Segment | $60.0M | 12% |
HCM
Segment breakdown not available.
