vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Distribution Solutions Group, Inc. (DSGR) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Monolithic Power Systems is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($751.2M vs $518.0M, roughly 1.5× Distribution Solutions Group, Inc.). Monolithic Power Systems runs the higher net margin — 22.9% vs 1.2%, a 21.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Monolithic Power Systems posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.8% vs 10.7%). Monolithic Power Systems produced more free cash flow last quarter ($63.9M vs $32.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Monolithic Power Systems's revenue compounded faster (28.1% CAGR vs 13.1%).
Univar Solutions Inc. is a global chemical and ingredients distributor and provider of value-added services.
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. is an American, publicly traded company headquartered in Kirkland, Washington. It operates in more than 15 locations worldwide.
DSGR vs MPWR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $518.0M | $751.2M |
| Net Profit | $6.5M | $171.7M |
| Gross Margin | 32.9% | 55.2% |
| Operating Margin | 4.6% | 26.6% |
| Net Margin | 1.2% | 22.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.7% | 20.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -70.6% | -86.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.14 | $3.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $751.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $518.0M | $737.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $502.4M | $664.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $478.0M | $637.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $480.5M | $621.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $468.0M | $620.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $439.5M | $507.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $416.1M | $457.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $171.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5M | $179.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.0M | $135.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3M | $135.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-25.9M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.9M | $144.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9M | $100.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.2M | $92.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 55.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.9% | 55.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.9% | 55.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.3% | 55.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.3% | 55.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.9% | 55.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.5% | 55.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.5% | 55.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 26.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.6% | 26.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | 24.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.2% | 26.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.2% | 26.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 26.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 23.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 20.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 22.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | 24.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 20.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.4% | 201.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.7% | 23.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 19.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.3% | 20.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.14 | $3.74 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.11 | $2.81 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.07 | $2.81 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.55 | $25.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.46 | $2.95 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.04 | $2.05 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.11 | $1.89 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $69.2M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $665.5M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $653.9M | $3.5B |
| Total Assets | $1.8B | $4.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.02× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $69.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.4M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $66.5M | $862.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $46.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $73.1M | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $665.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $675.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $712.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $693.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $704.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $573.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $535.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $653.9M | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $649.4M | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $636.7M | $3.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $640.5M | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $680.8M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $653.3M | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $654.7M | $2.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $2.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.02× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.04× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.12× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.08× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.88× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.82× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $38.4M | $104.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $32.9M | $63.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.3% | 8.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.1% | 5.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.95× | 0.61× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $92.2M | $666.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $104.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.4M | $239.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.3M | $237.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.8M | $256.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.7M | $167.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-17.3M | $231.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.4M | $141.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.6M | $248.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $63.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.9M | $196.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.7M | $189.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.4M | $216.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.1M | $102.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-20.5M | $197.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.0M | $109.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2M | $232.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.3% | 26.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.7% | 28.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.2% | 33.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.6% | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.4% | 31.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.1% | 21.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.0% | 50.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.7% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | 3.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.61× | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.95× | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.66× | 1.76× | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.46× | 1.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.79× | 1.60× | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.28× | 1.40× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.68× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DSGR
| Test Equity Segment | $206.5M | 40% |
| Gexpro Services Segment | $130.5M | 25% |
| Lawson Segment | $121.5M | 23% |
| Canada Branch Division Segment | $60.0M | 12% |
MPWR
Segment breakdown not available.