vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dynatrace, Inc. (DT) and Essex Property Trust (ESS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dynatrace, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($515.5M vs $479.6M, roughly 1.1× Essex Property Trust). Essex Property Trust runs the higher net margin — 17.9% vs 7.8%, a 10.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dynatrace, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.2% vs 5.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Dynatrace, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.3% CAGR vs 6.0%).
Dynatrace, Inc. is an American multinational technology company that provides an AI-powered observability platform. Their software is used to monitor, analyze, and optimize application performance, software development, cyber security practices, IT infrastructure, and user experience.
Essex Property Trust is a publicly traded real estate investment trust that invests in apartments in California and in the Seattle metropolitan area.
DT vs ESS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $515.5M | $479.6M |
| Net Profit | $40.1M | $85.7M |
| Gross Margin | 81.4% | 70.0% |
| Operating Margin | 14.1% | 31.7% |
| Net Margin | 7.8% | 17.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 18.2% | 5.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -88.9% | -71.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $1.24 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $515.5M | $479.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $493.8M | $473.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $477.3M | $469.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $445.2M | $464.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $436.2M | $454.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $418.1M | $450.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $399.2M | $442.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $380.8M | $426.9M |
| Q4 25 | $40.1M | $85.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.2M | $172.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.0M | $231.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.3M | $212.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $361.8M | $301.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.0M | $125.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.6M | $99.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $37.9M | $285.1M |
| Q4 25 | 81.4% | 70.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 81.8% | 69.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 82.1% | 70.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 80.9% | 69.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 81.1% | 70.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 81.4% | 69.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 81.3% | 70.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 81.1% | 69.7% |
| Q4 25 | 14.1% | 31.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.8% | 44.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.1% | 59.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | 55.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.9% | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 28.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.5% | 31.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.1% | 31.0% |
| Q4 25 | 7.8% | 17.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.6% | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.0% | 49.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.8% | 45.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 82.9% | 66.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.5% | 27.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 22.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.0% | 66.8% |
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | $1.24 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.19 | $2.56 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.16 | $3.44 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.12 | $3.16 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.19 | $4.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.15 | $1.84 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.13 | $1.45 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.13 | $4.25 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.2B | $76.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $5.5B |
| Total Assets | $4.1B | $13.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $76.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $66.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $58.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $98.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $66.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $71.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $55.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $836.9M | $499.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.6B |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $5.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $5.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $5.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $5.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | $5.5B |
| Q4 25 | $4.1B | $13.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $13.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | $13.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $13.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | $12.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3B | $12.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $12.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4B | $12.9B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.14× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.22× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.13× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.19× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $33.8M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $27.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.84× | 12.53× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $465.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $33.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.0M | $342.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $269.7M | $216.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $162.8M | $281.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.6M | $316.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.7M | $218.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $131.7M | $314.9M |
| Q4 25 | $27.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $262.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $148.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $227.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 54.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 57.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 32.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.84× | 12.53× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.56× | 1.98× | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.62× | 0.93× | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.14× | 1.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.12× | 3.54× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.54× | 2.52× | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.97× | 2.21× | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.47× | 1.10× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DT
| Subscription And Circulation | $493.4M | 96% |
| Services | $22.1M | 4% |
ESS
Segment breakdown not available.
