vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dynatrace, Inc. (DT) and KENNAMETAL INC (KMT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
KENNAMETAL INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($592.6M vs $515.5M, roughly 1.1× Dynatrace, Inc.). KENNAMETAL INC runs the higher net margin — 10.3% vs 7.8%, a 2.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, KENNAMETAL INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.8% vs 18.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Dynatrace, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.3% CAGR vs 4.4%).
Dynatrace, Inc. is an American multinational technology company that provides an AI-powered observability platform. Their software is used to monitor, analyze, and optimize application performance, software development, cyber security practices, IT infrastructure, and user experience.
Kennametal, Inc. is a manufacturer of high-performance cutting tools and engineered components used in the aerospace, defense, transportation and oil and gas drilling industries. Its customer base is global.
DT vs KMT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $515.5M | $592.6M |
| Net Profit | $40.1M | $61.1M |
| Gross Margin | 81.4% | 35.1% |
| Operating Margin | 14.1% | 13.4% |
| Net Margin | 7.8% | 10.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 18.2% | 21.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -88.9% | 85.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $0.75 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $592.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $515.5M | $529.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $493.8M | $498.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $477.3M | $516.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $445.2M | $486.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $436.2M | $482.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $418.1M | $481.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $399.2M | $543.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $61.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $40.1M | $33.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.2M | $23.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.0M | $21.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.3M | $31.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $361.8M | $17.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.0M | $22.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.6M | $37.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | 35.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 81.4% | 32.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 81.8% | 31.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 82.1% | 28.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 80.9% | 32.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 81.1% | 30.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 81.4% | 31.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 81.3% | 31.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 13.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.1% | 9.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.8% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.1% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | 9.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.9% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.5% | 11.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 10.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.8% | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.6% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.0% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.8% | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 82.9% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.5% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 6.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.75 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | $0.44 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.19 | $0.30 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.16 | $0.28 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.12 | $0.41 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.19 | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.15 | $0.28 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.13 | $0.47 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.2B | $106.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $597.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | — |
| Total Assets | $4.1B | $2.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $106.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $129.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $103.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $140.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $97.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $121.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $119.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $128.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $597.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $597.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $597.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $596.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $596.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $596.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $596.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $596.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.1B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $2.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.45× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.46× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.46× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.49× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.48× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $33.8M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $27.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.84× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $465.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $33.8M | $55.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.0M | $17.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $269.7M | $78.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $162.8M | $28.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.2M | $55.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.6M | $45.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.7M | $113.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $27.2M | $42.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.8M | $-5.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $262.2M | $57.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $148.2M | $5.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.6M | $35.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.1M | $21.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $227.4M | $90.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | -1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 54.9% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.6% | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.8% | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 57.0% | 16.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.3% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 4.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.84× | 1.63× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.56× | 0.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.62× | 3.64× | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.14× | 0.92× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.12× | 3.08× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.54× | 2.07× | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.97× | 3.06× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DT
| Subscription And Circulation | $493.4M | 96% |
| Services | $22.1M | 4% |
KMT
| Americas | $298.3M | 50% |
| EMEA | $174.0M | 29% |
| Asia Pacific | $120.3M | 20% |
