vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dynatrace, Inc. (DT) and Mid-America Apartment Communities (MAA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Mid-America Apartment Communities is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($553.7M vs $515.5M, roughly 1.1× Dynatrace, Inc.). On growth, Mid-America Apartment Communities posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (438.7% vs 18.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Dynatrace, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.3% CAGR vs 0.7%).
Dynatrace, Inc. is an American multinational technology company that provides an AI-powered observability platform. Their software is used to monitor, analyze, and optimize application performance, software development, cyber security practices, IT infrastructure, and user experience.
Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. (MAA) is a publicly traded real estate investment trust based in Memphis, Tennessee that invests in apartments in the Southeastern United States and the Southwestern United States.
DT vs MAA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $515.5M | $553.7M |
| Net Profit | $40.1M | — |
| Gross Margin | 81.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 14.1% | — |
| Net Margin | 7.8% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 18.2% | 438.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -88.9% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $4.34 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $553.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $515.5M | $555.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $493.8M | $554.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $477.3M | $549.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $445.2M | $549.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $436.2M | $549.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $418.1M | $551.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $399.2M | $546.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $40.1M | $57.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.2M | $99.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.0M | $108.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.3M | $181.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $361.8M | $166.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.0M | $115.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.6M | $102.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 81.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 81.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 82.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 80.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 81.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 81.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 81.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.1% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.8% | 18.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.1% | 20.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | 34.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.9% | 31.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 21.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.5% | 19.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.8% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.6% | 18.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.0% | 19.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.8% | 33.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 82.9% | 30.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.5% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 18.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.34 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | $0.48 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.19 | $0.84 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.16 | $0.92 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.12 | $1.54 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.19 | $1.43 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.15 | $0.98 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.13 | $0.86 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.2B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | — |
| Total Assets | $4.1B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $60.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $32.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $54.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $55.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $43.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $50.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $62.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $5.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $5.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $5.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $5.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $6.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.1B | $12.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $11.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | $11.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $11.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | $11.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3B | $11.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $11.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $33.8M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $27.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.84× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $465.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $33.8M | $261.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.0M | $266.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $269.7M | $353.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $162.8M | $196.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.2M | $239.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.6M | $309.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.7M | $349.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $27.2M | $158.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.8M | $170.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $262.2M | $264.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $148.2M | $124.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.6M | $152.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.1M | $215.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $227.4M | $259.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | 28.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 30.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 54.9% | 48.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.3% | 22.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.6% | 27.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.8% | 39.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 57.0% | 47.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.3% | 18.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | 17.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | 16.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 13.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 15.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 17.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 16.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.84× | 4.55× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.56× | 2.68× | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.62× | 3.27× | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.14× | 1.08× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.12× | 1.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.54× | 2.69× | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.97× | 3.43× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DT
| Subscription And Circulation | $493.4M | 96% |
| Services | $22.1M | 4% |
MAA
| Same Store Communities | $517.0M | 93% |
| Non-Same Store Communities | $22.1M | 4% |
| Lease-up/Development Communities | $7.7M | 1% |
| Commercial Property/Land | $7.0M | 1% |
