vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dynatrace, Inc. (DT) and PRA GROUP INC (PRAA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dynatrace, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($515.5M vs $333.4M, roughly 1.5× PRA GROUP INC). PRA GROUP INC runs the higher net margin — 17.0% vs 7.8%, a 9.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dynatrace, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.2% vs 13.7%). Dynatrace, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($27.2M vs $-90.4M). Over the past eight quarters, Dynatrace, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.3% CAGR vs 14.2%).
Dynatrace, Inc. is an American multinational technology company that provides an AI-powered observability platform. Their software is used to monitor, analyze, and optimize application performance, software development, cyber security practices, IT infrastructure, and user experience.
PRA Group, Inc. is a publicly traded debt buyer and debt collection company based in Norfolk, Virginia. The company buys delinquent consumer debt from credit card issuers and other financial institutions at a discount and pursues collection of the full debt owed. Founded in 1996, PRA Group employs more than 3200 people in 18 countries.
DT vs PRAA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $515.5M | $333.4M |
| Net Profit | $40.1M | $56.5M |
| Gross Margin | 81.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 14.1% | 37.7% |
| Net Margin | 7.8% | 17.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 18.2% | 13.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -88.9% | 206.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $1.47 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $515.5M | $333.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $493.8M | $311.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $477.3M | $287.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $445.2M | $269.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $436.2M | $293.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $418.1M | $281.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $399.2M | $284.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $380.8M | $255.6M |
| Q4 25 | $40.1M | $56.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.2M | $-407.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.0M | $42.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.3M | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $361.8M | $18.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.0M | $27.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.6M | $21.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $37.9M | $3.5M |
| Q4 25 | 81.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 81.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 82.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 80.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 81.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 81.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 81.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 81.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 14.1% | 37.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.8% | -101.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.1% | 29.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | 27.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.9% | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 32.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.5% | 31.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.1% | 26.0% |
| Q4 25 | 7.8% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.6% | -131.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.0% | 14.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.8% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 82.9% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.5% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.0% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | $1.47 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.19 | $-10.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.16 | $1.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.12 | $0.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.19 | $0.47 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.15 | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.13 | $0.54 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.13 | $0.09 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.2B | $104.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $979.9M |
| Total Assets | $4.1B | $5.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $104.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $107.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $131.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $128.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $105.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $141.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $118.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $836.9M | $108.1M |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $979.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $928.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $4.1B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $5.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3B | $4.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4B | $4.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $33.8M | $-85.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $27.2M | $-90.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.3% | -27.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.3% | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.84× | -1.51× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $465.5M | $-169.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $33.8M | $-85.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.0M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $269.7M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $162.8M | $-52.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.2M | $-94.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.6M | $-35.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.7M | $-29.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $131.7M | $-73.0M |
| Q4 25 | $27.2M | $-90.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.8M | $-11.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $262.2M | $-14.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $148.2M | $-53.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.6M | $-98.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.1M | $-36.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $227.4M | $-30.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.9M | $-73.5M |
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | -27.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | -3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 54.9% | -4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.3% | -19.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.6% | -33.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.8% | -12.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 57.0% | -10.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 32.0% | -28.8% |
| Q4 25 | 1.3% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 0.2% |
| Q4 25 | 0.84× | -1.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.62× | -0.30× | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.14× | -14.37× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.12× | -5.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.54× | -1.29× | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.97× | -1.37× | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.47× | -21.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DT
| Subscription And Circulation | $493.4M | 96% |
| Services | $22.1M | 4% |
PRAA
| GB | $170.1M | 51% |
| Other | $163.3M | 49% |
