vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PRECISION BIOSCIENCES INC (DTIL) and GrabAGun Digital Holdings Inc. (PEW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PRECISION BIOSCIENCES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($34.2M vs $22.3M, roughly 1.5× GrabAGun Digital Holdings Inc.). PRECISION BIOSCIENCES INC runs the higher net margin — 58.9% vs -17.2%, a 76.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. GrabAGun Digital Holdings Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-3.1M vs $-11.3M).
Precision BioSciences, Inc. is a publicly traded American clinical stage gene editing company headquartered in Durham, North Carolina. Founded in 2006, Precision is focused on developing both in vivo and ex vivo gene editing therapies using its proprietary "ARCUS" genome editing platform.
GrabAGun Digital Holdings Inc operates a leading U.S. e-commerce platform selling legal firearms, ammunition, shooting accessories, and outdoor gear. It serves individual customers, licensed firearms dealers, and law enforcement across the U.S., complying with all local, state, and federal firearm sales regulations.
DTIL vs PEW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $34.2M | $22.3M |
| Net Profit | $20.1M | $-3.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 9.6% |
| Operating Margin | 36.6% | -21.4% |
| Net Margin | 58.9% | -17.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 5261.1% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 213.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.62 | $-0.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $34.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.0K | $22.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $638.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $576.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $20.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-21.8M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-23.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-16.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 36.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -158976.9% | -21.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -121538.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -76248.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -3693.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 48.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 58.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -167476.9% | -17.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -130666.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -70913.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -2851.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 65.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 48.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.62 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.84 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.13 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.21 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.25 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.67 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.70 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $115.6M | $109.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $92.2M | $106.6M |
| Total Assets | $154.4M | $119.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $115.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.9M | $109.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $77.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $86.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $101.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $123.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $137.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $92.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.6M | $106.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $56.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $74.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $37.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $154.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $93.5M | $119.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $124.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $136.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $153.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $165.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $184.7M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-11.3M | $-3.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-11.3M | $-3.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -32.9% | -13.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.56× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-11.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-15.3M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-20.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-19.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-58.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-14.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-19.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-11.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-3.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-20.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-19.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-58.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-14.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-19.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | -32.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -13.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -112627.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -65917.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -9199.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1033.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -29.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -108.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 220.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.56× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.45× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.21× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DTIL
Segment breakdown not available.
PEW
| Firearm Sales | $18.1M | 81% |
| Non-Firearm Sales | $4.2M | 19% |
