vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Duke Energy (DUK) and GRUPO TELEVISA, S.A.B. (TV). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GRUPO TELEVISA, S.A.B. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($14.5B vs $7.9B, roughly 1.8× Duke Energy). Duke Energy runs the higher net margin — 20.0% vs -51.8%, a 71.8% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Duke Energy Corporation is an American electric power and natural gas holding company headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina. The company serves over 7 million customers in the eastern United States. In 2024 it ranked as the 141st largest company in the United States – its highest-ever placement on the Fortune 500 list.
"Grupo Televisa, S.A.B.", simply known as "Televisa", is a Mexican telecommunications and broadcasting company and the largest in Latin America A major Latin American mass media corporation, it often presents itself as the largest producer of Spanish-language content.
DUK vs TV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.9B | $14.5B |
| Net Profit | $1.6B | $-7.5B |
| Gross Margin | — | 38.8% |
| Operating Margin | 34.6% | 10.0% |
| Net Margin | 20.0% | -51.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 491.0% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 603.6% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $7.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.8B | $14.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.4B | $14.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4B | $14.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $-7.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $984.0M | $552.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $900.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 38.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 36.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 38.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | 34.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 27.3% | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.9% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.8% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | 20.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.2% | -51.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.3% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.49 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.81 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.25 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.76 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.54 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.60 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.13 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.1B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $54.1B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $56.5B | — |
| Total Assets | $198.0B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.96× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $245.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $688.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $344.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $475.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $314.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $376.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $390.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | $54.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $80.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $76.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $56.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $51.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $50.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.7B | — |
| Q1 26 | $198.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $195.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $192.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $189.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $187.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $186.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $183.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $181.6B | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.96× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.55× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.52× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-65.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.04× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $-65.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-485.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $179.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-417.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-971.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $288.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $537.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-43.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -6.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -11.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 53.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 38.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 42.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | -0.04× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.09× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.56× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.91× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.58× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.80× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.75× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.28× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DUK
| Regulated electric | $7.8B | 99% |
| Nonregulated electric and other | $61.0M | 1% |
TV
Segment breakdown not available.
