vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DUOS TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC. (DUOT) and SS Innovations International, Inc. (SSII). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SS Innovations International, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($14.5M vs $9.5M, roughly 1.5× DUOS TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.). SS Innovations International, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -17.0% vs -33.8%, a 16.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DUOS TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (547.5% vs 79.1%). SS Innovations International, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-3.2M vs $-18.6M). Over the past eight quarters, DUOS TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (149.0% CAGR vs 99.9%).
DUOS Technologies Group Inc. develops and deploys AI-powered automation, inspection, and security solutions for railway transportation, critical infrastructure, and commercial clients across North America. Its offerings include real-time monitoring systems and safety tools that help customers boost efficiency, reduce risks, and strengthen site security.
SS Innovations International, Inc. is a global medical technology enterprise specializing in the research, development and manufacturing of innovative surgical robotic systems. It provides high-precision, accessible robotic platforms for minimally invasive surgery, catering to healthcare facilities across multiple regions to boost surgical outcomes and cut procedural burdens.
DUOT vs SSII — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.5M | $14.5M |
| Net Profit | $-3.2M | $-2.5M |
| Gross Margin | 26.7% | 43.9% |
| Operating Margin | -36.1% | -3.7% |
| Net Margin | -33.8% | -17.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 547.5% | 79.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 6.1% | -28.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.10 | $-0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $9.5M | $14.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.9M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7M | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.0M | $5.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5M | $8.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2M | $4.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5M | $4.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-3.2M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.0M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.5M | $-256.7K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.1M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.4M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.4M | $-3.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.2M | $-4.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-9.8M |
| Q4 25 | 26.7% | 43.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.6% | 48.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.5% | 59.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -22.6% | 48.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.4% | 52.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -14.2% | 31.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 20.0% |
| Q4 25 | -36.1% | -3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.2% | -14.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -60.0% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -36.1% | -115.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -211.2% | -22.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -59.3% | -73.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -212.9% | -90.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -270.3% |
| Q4 25 | -33.8% | -17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -15.1% | -29.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -61.3% | -2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -42.0% | -111.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -233.2% | -23.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -43.3% | -74.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -212.1% | -91.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -270.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.10 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.06 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.30 | $0.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.18 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.40 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.18 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.43 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $3.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $48.6M | $38.2M |
| Total Assets | $63.4M | $74.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $3.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $11.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $466.5K | ||
| Q3 24 | $613.6K | $220.4K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $608.2K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $948.1K |
| Q4 25 | $48.6M | $38.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.5M | $39.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7M | $42.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2M | $40.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3M | $13.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5M | $13.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9M | $14.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $16.7M |
| Q4 25 | $63.4M | $74.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $69.8M | $69.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.1M | $70.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.1M | $63.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $35.0M | $42.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.0M | $39.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.2M | $35.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $35.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.7M | $-1.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-18.6M | $-3.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -196.3% | -22.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 167.6% | 11.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-37.4M | $-22.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-2.7M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.2M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.2M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.7M | $-6.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.3M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.9M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-18.6M | $-3.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.6M | $-8.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.0M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.2M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.9M | $-4.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.8M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.8M |
| Q4 25 | -196.3% | -22.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -139.7% | -64.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -69.6% | -37.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -105.9% | -136.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 166.2% | -41.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -90.2% | -96.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -184.3% | -69.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -76.9% |
| Q4 25 | 167.6% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 93.8% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.8% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.6% | 17.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.5% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.5% | 38.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 58.0% | 46.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.5% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DUOT
| Services And Consulting Related Parties | $8.5M | 90% |
| Other | $929.3K | 10% |
SSII
| System Sales | $13.4M | 92% |
| Other | $1.2M | 8% |