vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DUOS TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC. (DUOT) and TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc. (TLSI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.2M vs $9.5M, roughly 1.4× DUOS TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.). DUOS TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC. runs the higher net margin — -33.8% vs -73.9%, a 40.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DUOS TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (547.5% vs 59.8%). TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-2.5M vs $-18.6M). Over the past eight quarters, DUOS TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (149.0% CAGR vs 43.0%).
DUOS Technologies Group Inc. develops and deploys AI-powered automation, inspection, and security solutions for railway transportation, critical infrastructure, and commercial clients across North America. Its offerings include real-time monitoring systems and safety tools that help customers boost efficiency, reduce risks, and strengthen site security.
TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology company focused on advancing immuno-oncology and interventional oncology solutions. It develops proprietary targeted drug delivery technologies designed to improve treatment efficacy for patients with liver, pancreatic and other hard-to-treat solid tumors, primarily operating in North American markets via partnerships with clinical care and research institutions.
DUOT vs TLSI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.5M | $13.2M |
| Net Profit | $-3.2M | $-9.8M |
| Gross Margin | 26.7% | 86.7% |
| Operating Margin | -36.1% | -24.8% |
| Net Margin | -33.8% | -73.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 547.5% | 59.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 6.1% | 3.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.10 | $-0.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $9.5M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.9M | $11.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7M | $11.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.0M | $9.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5M | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2M | $7.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5M | $7.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-3.2M | $-9.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.0M | $-10.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.5M | $-8.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.1M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.4M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.4M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.2M | $-4.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-13.2M |
| Q4 25 | 26.7% | 86.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.6% | 83.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.5% | 83.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | 83.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -22.6% | 85.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.4% | 86.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -14.2% | 87.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 85.0% |
| Q4 25 | -36.1% | -24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.2% | -77.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -60.0% | -65.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -36.1% | -79.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -211.2% | -91.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -59.3% | -118.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -212.9% | -111.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -180.8% |
| Q4 25 | -33.8% | -73.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -15.1% | -93.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -61.3% | -73.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -42.0% | -113.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -233.2% | -122.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -43.3% | -32.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -212.1% | -58.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -204.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.10 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.06 | $-0.96 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.30 | $-0.27 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.18 | $-0.39 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.40 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.18 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.43 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.60 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $20.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $48.6M | $-33.9M |
| Total Assets | $63.4M | $35.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $20.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $22.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $26.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $613.6K | $11.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $16.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.0M |
| Q4 25 | $48.6M | $-33.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.5M | $-26.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7M | $-19.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2M | $-34.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3M | $-25.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5M | $-20.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9M | $-25.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-36.0M |
| Q4 25 | $63.4M | $35.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $69.8M | $36.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.1M | $41.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.1M | $28.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $35.0M | $24.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.0M | $27.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.2M | $32.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $17.9M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.7M | $-2.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-18.6M | $-2.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -196.3% | -19.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 167.6% | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-37.4M | $-19.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-2.7M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.2M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.2M | $-7.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.7M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.3M | $-10.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.9M | $-13.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-10.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-18.6M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.6M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.0M | $-7.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.2M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4M | $-5.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.9M | $-11.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.8M | $-13.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-10.9M |
| Q4 25 | -196.3% | -19.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -139.7% | -33.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -69.6% | -66.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -105.9% | -57.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 166.2% | -69.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -90.2% | -149.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -184.3% | -183.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -169.3% |
| Q4 25 | 167.6% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 93.8% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.8% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.6% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.5% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.5% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 58.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.0% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DUOT
| Services And Consulting Related Parties | $8.5M | 90% |
| Other | $929.3K | 10% |
TLSI
Segment breakdown not available.
