vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DaVita (DVA) and UGI CORP (UGI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DaVita is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.6B vs $2.1B, roughly 1.8× UGI CORP). UGI CORP runs the higher net margin — 14.4% vs 6.5%, a 7.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DaVita posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.3% vs 3.9%). Over the past eight quarters, DaVita's revenue compounded faster (6.6% CAGR vs -7.5%).
DaVita Inc. is an American company that provides kidney dialysis services through a network of 2,675 outpatient centers in the United States, serving 200,800 patients, and 367 outpatient centers in 11 other countries serving 49,400 patients. The company primarily treats end-stage renal disease (ESRD), which requires patients to undergo kidney dialysis, often 3 times per week for the rest of their lives unless they receive a kidney transplant via organ donation.
UGI Corporation is a natural gas and electric power distribution company headquartered in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, with extensive operations in the United States and Europe.
DVA vs UGI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.6B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $234.2M | $297.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 15.5% | 22.0% |
| Net Margin | 6.5% | 14.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.3% | 3.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 43.8% | -20.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $3.22 | $1.34 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.6B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | $234.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $234.2M | $297.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $150.3M | $-13.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.3M | $-163.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $162.9M | $479.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $259.3M | $375.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $214.7M | $-273.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $222.7M | $-48.0M |
| Q1 26 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.5% | 22.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.8% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.9% | -6.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.6% | 26.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.2% | 24.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.4% | -20.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.9% | 5.0% |
| Q1 26 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.5% | 14.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.4% | -1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.9% | -12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.1% | 18.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.9% | 18.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.6% | -22.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.0% | -3.6% |
| Q1 26 | $3.22 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.22 | $1.34 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.04 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.58 | $-0.76 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.00 | $2.19 | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.08 | $1.74 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.50 | $-1.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.50 | $-0.23 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $700.7M | $251.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $10.2B | $6.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-651.1M | $5.0B |
| Total Assets | $17.5B | $15.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.19× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $700.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $700.7M | $251.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $736.5M | $335.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $739.4M | $350.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $511.9M | $426.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $846.0M | $240.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $213.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $437.2M | $183.0M |
| Q1 26 | $10.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.2B | $6.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.2B | $6.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.1B | $5.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.6B | $6.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.2B | $6.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.3B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.5B | $6.3B |
| Q1 26 | $-651.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-651.1M | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-571.9M | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-369.6M | $4.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-267.1M | $5.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $121.1M | $4.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $386.7M | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $632.9M | $4.7B |
| Q1 26 | $17.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $17.5B | $15.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.6B | $15.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.5B | $15.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.1B | $15.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.3B | $15.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $15.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.0B | $15.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.37× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | 75.76× | 1.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.95× | 1.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.35× | 1.34× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $66.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-155.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -7.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 10.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.22× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $282.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $540.7M | $66.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $841.5M | $90.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $324.2M | $289.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $180.0M | $684.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $547.6M | $164.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $810.4M | $151.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $798.8M | $390.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $395.3M | $-155.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $675.4M | $-168.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $203.1M | $67.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.8M | $538.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $377.0M | $-47.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $671.4M | $-115.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $674.1M | $185.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | -7.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.7% | -14.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | 20.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.4% | -2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.6% | -9.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.2% | 13.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | 22.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 16.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.4% | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.2% | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.3% | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 15.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.31× | 0.22× | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.60× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.63× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.10× | 1.43× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.11× | 0.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.77× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.59× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
