vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DXC Technology Co (DXC) and Kinder Morgan (KMI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Kinder Morgan is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.8B vs $3.2B, roughly 1.5× DXC Technology Co). Kinder Morgan runs the higher net margin — 20.7% vs 3.4%, a 17.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kinder Morgan posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.8% vs -1.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Kinder Morgan's revenue compounded faster (22.6% CAGR vs -2.9%).
DXC Technology Company is an American multinational information technology (IT) services and consulting company headquartered in Ashburn, Virginia.
Kinder Morgan, Inc. is one of the largest energy infrastructure companies in North America. The company specializes in owning and controlling oil and gas pipelines and terminals.
DXC vs KMI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.2B | $4.8B |
| Net Profit | $107.0M | $1.0B |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 8.2% | 29.9% |
| Net Margin | 3.4% | 20.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.0% | 13.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 87.7% | 34.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.61 | $0.44 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $4.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $3.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $3.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $107.0M | $996.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.0M | $628.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.0M | $715.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $264.0M | $717.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.0M | $667.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $42.0M | $625.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.0M | $575.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.2% | 34.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.0% | 28.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.8% | 31.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.3% | 29.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.9% | 31.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.6% | 30.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.9% | 32.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 20.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 16.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | 19.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.3% | 18.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.8% | 18.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | 19.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 17.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.44 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.61 | $0.45 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.20 | $0.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.09 | $0.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.42 | $0.32 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.31 | $0.30 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.23 | $0.28 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.14 | $0.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.7B | $72.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.1B | $31.9B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.1B | $32.6B |
| Total Assets | $13.2B | $73.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.98× | 0.98× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $72.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $63.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $71.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $82.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $80.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $88.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $108.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $98.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $31.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $32.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.1B | $31.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1B | $30.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $30.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $30.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $30.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $30.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9B | $30.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $73.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.2B | $72.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.6B | $72.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.4B | $72.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.2B | $72.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.0B | $71.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.5B | $70.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.4B | $70.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.98× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.77× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.93× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.22× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.28× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.32× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $414.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $359.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 11.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.7% | 16.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.87× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.1B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $414.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $409.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $186.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $315.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $650.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $195.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $238.0M | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $359.0M | $872.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $365.0M | $621.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $143.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $238.0M | $396.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $568.0M | $738.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $154.0M | $592.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $190.0M | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.2% | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.5% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 27.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.5% | 10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.6% | 20.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.8% | 18.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.9% | 34.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 16.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.7% | 20.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 21.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | 17.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | 19.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.5% | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | 20.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 18.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.87× | 1.70× | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.36× | 2.25× | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.63× | 2.31× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.19× | 1.62× | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.40× | 2.26× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.64× | 2.00× | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.15× | 2.93× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DXC
| GIS Segment | $1.6B | 50% |
| CES Segment | $1.3B | 40% |
| Insurance Segment | $321.0M | 10% |
KMI
Segment breakdown not available.
