vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dexcom (DXCM) and Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hubbell Incorporated is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $1.3B, roughly 1.2× Dexcom). Dexcom runs the higher net margin — 21.2% vs 14.6%, a 6.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dexcom posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.6% vs 11.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Dexcom's revenue compounded faster (12.0% CAGR vs 3.3%).
Dexcom, Inc. is an American multinational healthcare company that develops, manufactures, produces and distributes a line of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems for diabetes management. It operates internationally with global headquarters and R&D center in San Diego, California, U.S.A. and manufacturing facilities in Mesa, Arizona, U.S.A.; Batu Kawan, Malaysia and Athenry, County Galway, Ireland.
Hubbell Incorporated, headquartered in Shelton, Connecticut, is an American company that designs, manufactures, and sells electrical and electronic products for non-residential and residential construction, industrial, and utility applications. Hubbell was founded by Harvey Hubbell as a proprietorship in 1888, and was incorporated in Connecticut in 1905.
DXCM vs HUBB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $1.5B |
| Net Profit | $267.3M | $217.7M |
| Gross Margin | 62.9% | 34.6% |
| Operating Margin | 25.6% | 20.3% |
| Net Margin | 21.2% | 14.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 21.6% | 11.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 153.6% | 10.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.67 | $4.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $994.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | $267.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $267.3M | $217.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $283.8M | $255.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $179.8M | $244.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $105.4M | $169.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.7M | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $134.6M | $219.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.5M | $213.6M |
| Q1 26 | 62.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 62.9% | 34.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.5% | 36.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.5% | 37.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 56.9% | 33.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 58.9% | 33.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 59.7% | 34.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 62.4% | 35.0% |
| Q1 26 | 25.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.6% | 20.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.1% | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.4% | 22.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.9% | 17.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.0% | 19.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.3% | 21.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.7% | 20.7% |
| Q1 26 | 21.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 21.2% | 14.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.5% | 17.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | 16.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.2% | 12.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.6% | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.5% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.3% | 14.7% |
| Q1 26 | $0.67 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.67 | $4.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.70 | $4.77 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.45 | $4.56 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.27 | $3.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.37 | $3.65 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.34 | $4.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.35 | $3.94 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $917.7M | $497.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $3.8B |
| Total Assets | $6.3B | $8.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $917.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $917.7M | $497.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $680.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $399.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $904.9M | $360.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $606.1M | $345.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $621.2M | $445.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $939.2M | $406.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.9B |
| Q1 26 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $3.1B |
| Q1 26 | $6.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.3B | $8.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $7.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.3B | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8B | $6.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5B | $6.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.4B | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.8B | $6.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.39× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.63× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $447.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $388.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 26.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.06× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $874.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $294.0M | $447.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $659.9M | $284.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $303.0M | $260.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $183.8M | $37.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $301.4M | $432.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $199.5M | $227.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $279.4M | $239.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $192.1M | $388.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $579.4M | $253.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $208.9M | $220.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $96.8M | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $176.8M | $364.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $88.3M | $188.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $213.3M | $205.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.3% | 26.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 47.9% | 16.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.1% | 14.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.9% | 27.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.9% | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.2% | 14.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.1% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.6% | 2.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.10× | 2.06× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.33× | 1.11× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.69× | 1.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.74× | 0.22× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.99× | 2.19× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.48× | 1.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.95× | 1.12× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DXCM
Segment breakdown not available.
HUBB
| Grid Infrastructure | $717.0M | 48% |
| Industrial | $393.7M | 26% |
| Grid Automation | $218.9M | 15% |
| Electrical Products | $163.1M | 11% |
