vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BRUNSWICK CORP (BC) and Dexcom (DXCM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BRUNSWICK CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $1.3B, roughly 1.1× Dexcom). Dexcom runs the higher net margin — 21.2% vs 1.4%, a 19.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dexcom posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.6% vs 15.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Dexcom's revenue compounded faster (12.0% CAGR vs -1.1%).
Brunswick Corporation, formerly known as the Brunswick-Balke-Collender Company, is an American corporation that has been developing, manufacturing and marketing a wide variety of products since 1845. Brunswick has more than 13,000 employees in 24 countries. Brunswick owns a number of brands, including Mercury Marine. In 2024, Brunswick reported sales of US$5.2 billion. Brunswick's global headquarters is in the northern Chicago suburb of Mettawa, Illinois.
Dexcom, Inc. is an American multinational healthcare company that develops, manufactures, produces and distributes a line of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems for diabetes management. It operates internationally with global headquarters and R&D center in San Diego, California, U.S.A. and manufacturing facilities in Mesa, Arizona, U.S.A.; Batu Kawan, Malaysia and Athenry, County Galway, Ireland.
BC vs DXCM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $1.3B |
| Net Profit | $18.7M | $267.3M |
| Gross Margin | 23.1% | 62.9% |
| Operating Margin | 3.1% | 25.6% |
| Net Margin | 1.4% | 21.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.5% | 21.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 122.7% | 153.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.32 | $0.67 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $994.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $267.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $18.7M | $267.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-235.5M | $283.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.3M | $179.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.2M | $105.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-82.5M | $151.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.6M | $134.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.0M | $143.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | 62.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.1% | 62.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.8% | 60.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.5% | 59.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.9% | 56.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.9% | 58.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.2% | 59.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.1% | 62.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 25.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.1% | 25.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -17.8% | 20.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.1% | 18.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.6% | 12.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.8% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.0% | 15.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 21.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -17.3% | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.1% | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 10.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.1% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.5% | 13.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.9% | 14.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.67 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.32 | $0.67 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.59 | $0.70 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.89 | $0.45 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.30 | $0.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.21 | $0.37 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.67 | $0.34 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.48 | $0.35 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $256.8M | $917.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.1B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.6B | $2.7B |
| Total Assets | $5.3B | $6.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.30× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $917.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $256.8M | $917.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $297.7M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $315.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $286.7M | $904.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $269.0M | $606.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $284.1M | $621.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $494.5M | $939.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.3B | $6.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.4B | $7.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8B | $7.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.9B | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.7B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.0B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.4B | $6.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.30× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.25× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $132.9M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $83.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 7.11× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $396.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $132.9M | $294.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $140.4M | $659.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $316.2M | $303.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-27.4M | $183.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $306.4M | $301.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.4M | $199.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $211.0M | $279.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $83.6M | $192.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.5M | $579.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $271.3M | $208.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-65.1M | $96.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $276.1M | $176.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.4M | $88.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $163.9M | $213.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.3% | 15.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.8% | 47.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.7% | 18.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.3% | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.9% | 15.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.4% | 21.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.7% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 8.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 8.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | 11.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.8% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | 6.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.11× | 1.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.33× | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.33× | 1.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.36× | 1.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.99× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.51× | 1.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.11× | 1.95× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BC
| Engine Partsand Accessories | $532.4M | 40% |
| Navico Group | $452.9M | 34% |
| Recreational Fiberglass Boats | $111.6M | 8% |
| Saltwater Fishing Boats | $85.7M | 6% |
| Controls Riggingand Propellers | $78.3M | 6% |
| Business Acceleration | $48.1M | 4% |
| Sterndrive Engine | $32.6M | 2% |
DXCM
Segment breakdown not available.
