vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dexcom (DXCM) and Teradyne (TER). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Teradyne is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $1.3B, roughly 1.0× Dexcom). Teradyne runs the higher net margin — 31.1% vs 21.2%, a 9.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Teradyne posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (87.0% vs 21.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Teradyne's revenue compounded faster (32.6% CAGR vs 12.0%).
Dexcom, Inc. is an American multinational healthcare company that develops, manufactures, produces and distributes a line of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems for diabetes management. It operates internationally with global headquarters and R&D center in San Diego, California, U.S.A. and manufacturing facilities in Mesa, Arizona, U.S.A.; Batu Kawan, Malaysia and Athenry, County Galway, Ireland.
Teradyne, Inc. is an American automatic test equipment (ATE) designer and manufacturer based in North Reading, Massachusetts. Its high-profile customers include Samsung, Qualcomm, Intel, Analog Devices, Texas Instruments and IBM.
DXCM vs TER — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $1.3B |
| Net Profit | $267.3M | $398.9M |
| Gross Margin | 62.9% | 60.9% |
| Operating Margin | 25.6% | 36.9% |
| Net Margin | 21.2% | 31.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 21.6% | 87.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 153.6% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.67 | $2.53 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $769.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $651.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $685.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $752.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $994.2M | $737.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $729.9M |
| Q1 26 | $267.3M | $398.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $267.3M | $257.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $283.8M | $119.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $179.8M | $78.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $105.4M | $98.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.7M | $146.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $134.6M | $145.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.5M | $186.3M |
| Q1 26 | 62.9% | 60.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 62.9% | 57.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.5% | 58.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.5% | 57.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 56.9% | 60.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 58.9% | 59.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 59.7% | 59.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 62.4% | 58.3% |
| Q1 26 | 25.6% | 36.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.6% | 27.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.1% | 18.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.4% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.9% | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.0% | 20.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.3% | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.7% | 28.8% |
| Q1 26 | 21.2% | 31.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 21.2% | 23.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.5% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | 12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.2% | 14.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.6% | 19.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.5% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.3% | 25.5% |
| Q1 26 | $0.67 | $2.53 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.67 | $1.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.70 | $0.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.45 | $0.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.27 | $0.61 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.37 | $0.89 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.34 | $0.89 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.35 | $1.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $917.7M | $241.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $0 |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | — |
| Total Assets | $6.3B | $4.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $917.7M | $241.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $917.7M | $293.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $272.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $339.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $904.9M | $475.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $606.1M | $553.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $621.2M | $510.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $939.2M | $421.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $0 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $2.7B |
| Q1 26 | $6.3B | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.3B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.3B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.4B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.8B | $3.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $265.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.66× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $265.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $294.0M | $281.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $659.9M | $49.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $303.0M | $182.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $183.8M | $161.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $301.4M | $282.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $199.5M | $166.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $279.4M | $216.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $192.1M | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $579.4M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $208.9M | $131.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $96.8M | $97.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $176.8M | $225.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $88.3M | $114.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $213.3M | $171.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.3% | 20.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 47.9% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.1% | 20.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.9% | 29.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.9% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.2% | 23.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.1% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.4% | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.6% | 6.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.66× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.10× | 1.09× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.33× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.69× | 2.32× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.74× | 1.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.99× | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.48× | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.95× | 1.16× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
