vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DESTINATION XL GROUP, INC. (DXLG) and URBAN OUTFITTERS INC (URBN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
URBAN OUTFITTERS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $101.9M, roughly 15.0× DESTINATION XL GROUP, INC.). URBAN OUTFITTERS INC runs the higher net margin — 7.6% vs -4.0%, a 11.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, URBAN OUTFITTERS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.3% vs -5.2%). DESTINATION XL GROUP, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-6.0M vs $-22.8M). Over the past eight quarters, URBAN OUTFITTERS INC's revenue compounded faster (1.4% CAGR vs -13.8%).
Destination XL Group, Inc. (DXLG) is a leading retailer of Men's Big and Tall apparel with 290 retail and outlet store locations throughout the United States operated under the business subsidiaries DXL and Casual Male XL. The company also operates an e-commerce website (dxl.com) and an Android and iOS mobile app serving customers in the United States, Canada, The United Kingdom, Greater China and other global markets. The company is headquartered in Canton, Massachusetts, and is listed on th...
Urban Outfitters, Inc. (URBN) is a multinational lifestyle retail corporation headquartered in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Operating in the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, select Western European countries, Poland, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, and Qatar, the Urban Outfitters brand targets young adults with a merchandise mix of women's and men's fashion apparel, footwear, beauty and wellness products, accessories, activewear and gear, and housewares, as well as music, primarily...
DXLG vs URBN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2026 vs Q3 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $101.9M | $1.5B |
| Net Profit | $-4.1M | $116.4M |
| Gross Margin | 42.7% | 36.8% |
| Operating Margin | -5.6% | 9.4% |
| Net Margin | -4.0% | 7.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -5.2% | 12.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -128.3% | 13.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.08 | $1.28 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $101.9M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $115.5M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $105.5M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.2M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $107.5M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $124.8M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $115.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $137.1M | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $-4.1M | $116.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-265.0K | $143.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.9M | $108.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | $120.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.8M | $102.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4M | $117.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8M | $61.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.2M | $47.8M |
| Q4 25 | 42.7% | 36.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.2% | 37.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.1% | 36.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.4% | 32.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.1% | 36.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 48.2% | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 48.2% | 34.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 47.0% | 29.2% |
| Q4 25 | -5.6% | 9.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.3% | 9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.5% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.4% | 9.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.9% | 3.9% |
| Q4 25 | -4.0% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.2% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.8% | 8.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.1% | 7.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.7% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.8% | 3.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.08 | $1.28 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.00 | $1.58 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.04 | $1.16 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.02 | $1.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.03 | $1.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.04 | $1.24 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.06 | $0.65 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.08 | $0.51 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $27.0M | $306.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $137.2M | $2.7B |
| Total Assets | $401.5M | $4.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $27.0M | $306.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.5M | $332.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.1M | $189.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $48.4M | $290.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.0M | $182.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.2M | $209.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $53.2M | $174.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $60.0M | $178.3M |
| Q4 25 | $137.2M | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $140.9M | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.7M | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $141.2M | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $145.5M | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $157.0M | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $153.6M | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $149.0M | $2.1B |
| Q4 25 | $401.5M | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $408.8M | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $380.1M | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $381.0M | $4.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $381.3M | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $383.8M | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $376.6M | $4.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $357.7M | $4.1B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.1M | $61.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-6.0M | $-22.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -5.9% | -1.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.8% | 5.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.53× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-11.4M | $402.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.1M | $61.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.9M | $218.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.0M | $33.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.1M | $320.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.5M | $18.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.1M | $105.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.1M | $58.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.5M | $229.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-6.0M | $-22.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.6M | $156.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-18.8M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.8M | $281.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-10.1M | $-26.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2M | $47.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-7.0M | $17.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.5M | $180.6M |
| Q4 25 | -5.9% | -1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | 10.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -17.8% | -1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.4% | 17.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -9.4% | -2.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.2% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.1% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.9% | 12.2% |
| Q4 25 | 4.8% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.6% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.5% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.1% | 3.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.53× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.52× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.17× | 0.90× | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.30× | 0.95× | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.15× | 4.80× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DXLG
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $74.5M | 73% |
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $27.3M | 27% |
URBN
| Apparel | $861.4M | 56% |
| Home | $187.0M | 12% |
| Accessories | $182.6M | 12% |
| Subscription Operations | $144.6M | 9% |
| Wholesale Operations | $88.3M | 6% |
| Other | $65.3M | 4% |
