vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ellington Credit Co (EARN) and ELBIT SYSTEMS LTD (ESLT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ellington Credit Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.1M vs $5.8M, roughly 1.1× ELBIT SYSTEMS LTD). ELBIT SYSTEMS LTD runs the higher net margin — 6.3% vs -32.6%, a 39.0% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Ellington Management Group is an American hedge fund firm. As of June 2019, the firm was reportedly managing $8.5 billion in structured products and other credit instruments.
Elbit Systems Ltd. is an Israel-based international military technology company and defense contractor. Founded in 1966 by Elron, Elbit Systems is the primary provider of the Israeli military's land-based equipment and unmanned aerial vehicles. It is an important company within the defense industry of Israel.
EARN vs ESLT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.1M | $5.8M |
| Net Profit | $-2.0M | $367.1K |
| Gross Margin | — | 24.3% |
| Operating Margin | -35.6% | 8.3% |
| Net Margin | -32.6% | 6.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 1528.9% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -116.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $7.85 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $-372.0K | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $5.2M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $7.1M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $367.1K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-815.0K | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $11.7M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $-13.7M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $-10.7M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 24.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 8.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -35.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -22.8% | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -32.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 114.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -20.9% | — | ||
| Q1 23 | -628.2% | — | ||
| Q4 22 | 476.7% | — | ||
| Q3 22 | -263.5% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | -150.9% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $7.85 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.8M | $265.4K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $90.7K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $193.7M | $3.3M |
| Total Assets | $824.1M | $11.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.03× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $265.4K | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $118.8M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $36.7M | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $34.8M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $25.4M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $37.5M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $90.7K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $193.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $191.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $146.1M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $115.0M | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $112.4M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $103.0M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $118.6M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $11.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $824.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $752.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $933.5M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $1.1B | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.4M | $534.6K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $319.6K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 5.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.46× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $534.6K | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $-2.4M | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $4.2M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $4.2M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $7.1M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $319.6K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 1.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.60× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | -1.02× | — | ||
| Q4 22 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
