vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC (EAT) and FuboTV Inc. (FUBO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FuboTV Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $1.5B, roughly 1.1× BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC). BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC runs the higher net margin — 8.8% vs -0.4%, a 9.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FuboTV Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (249.4% vs 6.9%). BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($155.2M vs $-200.8M). Over the past eight quarters, FuboTV Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (94.3% CAGR vs 13.9%).
Brinker International, Inc. is an American multinational hospitality industry company that owns Chili's and Maggiano's Little Italy restaurant chains. Founded in 1975 and based in Dallas, Texas, Brinker currently owns, operates, or franchises 1,672 restaurants under the names Chili's Grill & Bar and Maggiano's Little Italy worldwide.
FuboTV, Inc. and its subsidiary FuboTV Media, Inc., which operates as FuboTV or Fubo, is an American over-the-top sports streaming television service that serves customers in Canada, Spain, and the United States. The service focuses primarily on channels that distribute live sports. Depending on the country it is accessed in, channels offered by Fubo include access to the Premier League, NFL, MLB, NBA, NHL, MLS, CPL, and international football, as well as news, network television series, and ...
EAT vs FUBO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5B | $1.5B |
| Net Profit | $128.5M | $-6.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 11.6% | -1.3% |
| Net Margin | 8.8% | -0.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.9% | 249.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 8.4% | 84.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.86 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $377.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $380.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $416.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $386.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $391.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $402.3M |
| Q4 25 | $128.5M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.5M | $-18.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.0M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.1M | $188.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $118.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.5M | $-52.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $57.3M | $-25.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $48.7M | $-56.0M |
| Q4 25 | 11.6% | -1.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.7% | -5.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.8% | -1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.0% | -6.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.0% | -15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.1% | -9.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.2% | -15.7% |
| Q4 25 | 8.8% | -0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.4% | -5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.3% | -2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.4% | 45.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.4% | -13.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | -6.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.3% | -13.9% |
| Q4 25 | $2.86 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.17 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.31 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.56 | $0.55 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.61 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.84 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.22 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.08 | $-0.19 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $15.0M | $452.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $451.3M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $379.3M | $275.5M |
| Total Assets | $2.7B | $4.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.19× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $15.0M | $452.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.9M | $283.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.5M | $321.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.2M | $146.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.6M | $155.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.5M | $168.9M |
| Q4 25 | $451.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $525.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $426.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $518.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $652.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $806.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $786.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $818.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $379.3M | $275.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $343.9M | $915.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $370.9M | $400.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $259.0M | $389.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $131.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.7M | $905.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.4M | $254.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-46.7M | $236.1M |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5B | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | 1.19× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.53× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.15× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.00× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.96× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 63.54× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.96× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $218.9M | $-200.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $155.2M | $-200.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.7% | -13.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.4% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.70× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $455.9M | $-81.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $218.9M | $-200.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $120.8M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $186.0M | $-34.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $212.0M | $161.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $218.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $62.8M | $235.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $141.5M | $-32.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $130.1M | $-67.3M |
| Q4 25 | $155.2M | $-200.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $62.2M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.1M | $-35.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $132.4M | $161.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $168.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.5M | $-32.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $78.7M | $-67.4M |
| Q4 25 | 10.7% | -13.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.6% | -1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.3% | -9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | 38.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | -0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.9% | -8.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.0% | -16.7% |
| Q4 25 | 4.4% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.5% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.6% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.0% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.8% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.70× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.21× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.74× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | 0.86× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.84× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.63× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.47× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.67× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EAT
| Chilis Restaurants | $1.3B | 91% |
| Maggianos Restaurants | $134.9M | 9% |
| Franchise Revenues | $13.4M | 1% |
FUBO
| Related Party | $1.2B | 75% |
| Subscription And Advertising | $377.9M | 24% |
