vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ecolab (ECL) and Roper Technologies (ROP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ecolab is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.1B vs $2.1B, roughly 1.9× Roper Technologies). Roper Technologies runs the higher net margin — 15.8% vs 10.6%, a 5.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Roper Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.3% vs 10.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Roper Technologies's revenue compounded faster (10.5% CAGR vs 1.0%).
Ecolab Inc., headquartered in Saint Paul, Minnesota, provides products related to water treatment, sanitation, and hygiene, primarily to commercial and industrial customers.
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
ECL vs ROP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.1B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $432.6M | $331.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 69.4% |
| Operating Margin | 15.3% | 27.2% |
| Net Margin | 10.6% | 15.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.0% | 11.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 1.3% | 842.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.52 | $4.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 26 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.2B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $1.8B |
| Q2 26 | $432.6M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $331.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $563.9M | $428.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $585.0M | $398.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $524.2M | $378.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $402.5M | $331.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $472.9M | $462.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $736.5M | $367.9M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 69.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 44.0% | 69.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.8% | 69.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.8% | 69.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.2% | 68.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.3% | 68.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.4% | 69.2% |
| Q2 26 | 15.3% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 27.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.0% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.3% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.6% | 28.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.0% | 27.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.6% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.1% | 28.1% |
| Q2 26 | 10.6% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.4% | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.0% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.0% | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.9% | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.8% | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.4% | 20.8% |
| Q2 26 | $1.52 | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $4.87 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.98 | $3.97 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.05 | $3.68 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.84 | $3.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.41 | $3.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.65 | $4.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.58 | $3.40 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $519.8K | $382.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $8.5M | $9.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.0M | $18.8B |
| Total Assets | $25.0M | $34.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.85× | 0.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | $519.8K | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $382.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $646.2M | $297.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $320.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $242.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $372.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $188.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $269.6M |
| Q2 26 | $8.5M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.4B | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9B | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.0B | — |
| Q2 26 | $10.0M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $18.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.8B | $19.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.7B | $20.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.3B | $19.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.9B | $19.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.8B | $18.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.5B | $18.5B |
| Q2 26 | $25.0M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $34.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $24.7B | $34.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.9B | $34.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.7B | $33.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.4B | $31.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.4B | $31.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.1B | $31.6B |
| Q2 26 | 0.85× | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 0.52× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.75× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.83× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.81× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.79× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.79× | 0.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.82× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $507.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 24.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $738.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $791.3M | $869.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $701.8M | $404.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $369.4M | $528.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $766.7M | $722.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $786.7M | $755.4M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $507.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $758.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $529.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $485.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $131.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $407.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $550.3M | — |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.8% | — |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.9% | — |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.93× | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.35× | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.34× | 1.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.92× | 1.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.62× | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.07× | 2.05× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ECL
| Product and equipment sales | $3.2B | 78% |
| Service and lease sales | $891.5M | 22% |
ROP
Segment breakdown not available.
