vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ecolab (ECL) and SharkNinja, Inc. (SN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SharkNinja, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.5B vs $4.1B, roughly 1.4× Ecolab). On growth, SharkNinja, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.0% vs 10.0%).
Ecolab Inc., headquartered in Saint Paul, Minnesota, provides products related to water treatment, sanitation, and hygiene, primarily to commercial and industrial customers.
SharkNinja is a global product design and technology company based in Needham, Massachusetts. Founded in 1994 by Mark Rosenzweig and led by CEO Mark Barrocas, who joined the company in 2008 as president. The company's name is formed by combining its two primary brands: Shark and Ninja.
ECL vs SN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.1B | $5.5B |
| Net Profit | $432.6M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 48.1% |
| Operating Margin | 15.3% | 11.7% |
| Net Margin | 10.6% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 10.0% | 30.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 1.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.52 | $3.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 26 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | — |
| Q2 26 | $432.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $563.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $585.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $524.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $402.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $472.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $736.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $490.9M | — |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 44.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.3% | 48.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.8% | — |
| Q2 26 | 15.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.6% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.5% | — |
| Q2 26 | 10.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.3% | — |
| Q2 26 | $1.52 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.98 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.05 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.84 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.41 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.65 | $3.11 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.58 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.71 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $519.8K | $363.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $8.5M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.0M | $1.9B |
| Total Assets | $25.0M | $4.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.85× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | $519.8K | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $646.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $363.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $384.0M | — |
| Q2 26 | $8.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.5B | — |
| Q2 26 | $10.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.8B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.3B | — |
| Q2 26 | $25.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $24.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.4B | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.5B | — |
| Q2 26 | 0.85× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.75× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.83× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.81× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.79× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.79× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.82× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.91× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $446.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $308.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 5.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $791.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $701.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $369.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $766.7M | $446.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $786.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $611.1M | — |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $758.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $529.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $485.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $131.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $407.0M | $308.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $550.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $414.2M | — |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.2% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.4% | — |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.0% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.9% | — |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.93× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.35× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.34× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.92× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.62× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.07× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.24× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ECL
| Product and equipment sales | $3.2B | 78% |
| Service and lease sales | $891.5M | 22% |
SN
Segment breakdown not available.
