vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. (ECO) and Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hims & Hers Health, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($608.1M vs $393.2M, roughly 1.5× Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp.). Over the past eight quarters, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (38.8% CAGR vs 20.5%).
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. is a global shipping enterprise specializing in the operation of eco-friendly tanker fleets. Its core business covers maritime transport of crude oil and refined petroleum products, serving major energy and commodity clients across key international trade routes, with a focus on cutting carbon emissions via energy-efficient vessel designs.
Hims & Hers Health, Inc. is an American telehealth company established in 2017. The company provides prescription medications, over-the-counter medications, and personal care products.
ECO vs HIMS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $393.2M | $608.1M |
| Net Profit | — | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 65.2% |
| Operating Margin | 41.4% | 21.9% |
| Net Margin | — | — |
| Revenue YoY | — | 3.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.40 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $608.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $393.2M | $617.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $308.0M | $599.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-49.0M | $544.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $111.1M | $586.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $413.1M | $481.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $321.4M | $401.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $232.4M | $315.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $20.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $15.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $42.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $49.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $75.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $13.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 65.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 71.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 73.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 76.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 73.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 76.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 79.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 81.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 21.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 41.4% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.2% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 101.1% | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 49.6% | 9.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.7% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.0% | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 56.7% | 3.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 18.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.40 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.08 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.17 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.20 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.32 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $116.6M | $222.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $573.1M | $446.2M |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $2.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $222.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $116.6M | $228.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $345.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $273.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.3M | $220.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $165.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.8M | $129.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $446.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $573.1M | $540.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $581.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $428.3M | $562.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $549.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $410.4M | $476.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $440.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $432.6M | $362.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $891.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $707.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $602.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $480.5M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $111.3M | $89.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $53.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 8.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $60.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $89.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $111.3M | $61.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $132.2M | $148.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-19.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $109.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.8M | $86.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $85.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $53.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $53.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $79.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-69.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $50.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $59.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $79.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $47.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -12.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 12.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.98× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.45× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.20× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.32× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.13× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.03× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ECO
Segment breakdown not available.
HIMS
| United States Revenue | $529.9M | 87% |
| Rest of the World Revenue | $78.2M | 13% |
