vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Global-E Online Ltd. (GLBE) and Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Global-E Online Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($625.5M vs $617.8M, roughly 1.0× Hims & Hers Health, Inc.). Hims & Hers Health, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 3.3% vs 0.9%, a 2.4% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Global-E Online Ltd. operates a leading cross-border e-commerce enablement platform that helps direct-to-consumer brands and retail enterprises expand their international sales reach. It offers end-to-end services including localized checkout, payment processing, customs clearance, logistics coordination, and duty calculation, serving clients across North America, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific region.
Hims & Hers Health, Inc. is an American telehealth company established in 2017. The company provides prescription medications, over-the-counter medications, and personal care products.
GLBE vs HIMS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $625.5M | $617.8M |
| Net Profit | $5.8M | $20.6M |
| Gross Margin | 45.0% | 71.9% |
| Operating Margin | 1.3% | 1.5% |
| Net Margin | 0.9% | 3.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 28.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -20.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.08 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $617.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $625.5M | $599.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $404.8M | $544.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $189.9M | $586.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $481.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $489.9M | $401.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $313.9M | $315.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $145.9M | $278.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $20.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8M | $15.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.4M | $42.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $49.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-77.1M | $75.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-54.5M | $13.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $11.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 71.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.0% | 73.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.9% | 76.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.3% | 73.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 76.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.1% | 79.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.8% | 81.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 43.4% | 82.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.1% | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.1% | 9.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.9% | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.6% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -20.1% | 3.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.8% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -15.7% | 18.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -17.4% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.08 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.17 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.20 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.32 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $251.4M | $228.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $933.0M | $540.9M |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $2.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $228.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $251.4M | $345.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $205.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $207.7M | $273.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $220.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $207.3M | $165.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $229.8M | $129.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $181.9M | $105.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $540.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $933.0M | $581.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $909.1M | $562.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $884.3M | $549.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $476.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $869.4M | $440.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $878.7M | $362.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $886.9M | $344.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $891.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $707.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $602.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $480.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $448.1M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $61.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-2.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -0.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 10.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.98× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $57.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $61.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $148.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-19.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $109.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $86.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $85.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $53.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $25.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $79.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-69.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $50.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $59.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $79.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $47.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $11.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -12.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 12.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.98× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.45× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.20× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.32× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.13× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.03× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.32× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
