vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. (ECO) and Kimco Realty (KIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Kimco Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($542.5M vs $393.2M, roughly 1.4× Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp.). Over the past eight quarters, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (20.5% CAGR vs 3.8%).

Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. is a global shipping enterprise specializing in the operation of eco-friendly tanker fleets. Its core business covers maritime transport of crude oil and refined petroleum products, serving major energy and commodity clients across key international trade routes, with a focus on cutting carbon emissions via energy-efficient vessel designs.

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

ECO vs KIM — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
KIM
KIM
1.4× larger
KIM
$542.5M
$393.2M
ECO
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
ECO
ECO
Annualised
ECO
20.5%
3.8%
KIM

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
ECO
ECO
KIM
KIM
Revenue
$393.2M
$542.5M
Net Profit
$151.2M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
41.4%
36.4%
Net Margin
27.9%
Revenue YoY
3.2%
Net Profit YoY
-9.0%
EPS (diluted)

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
ECO
ECO
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
$393.2M
$542.5M
Q3 25
$308.0M
$535.9M
Q2 25
$-49.0M
$525.2M
Q1 25
$111.1M
$536.6M
Q4 24
$413.1M
$525.4M
Q3 24
$321.4M
$507.6M
Q2 24
$232.4M
$500.2M
Q1 24
$503.8M
Net Profit
ECO
ECO
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
$151.2M
Q3 25
$137.8M
Q2 25
$163.0M
Q1 25
$132.8M
Q4 24
$166.0M
Q3 24
$136.0M
Q2 24
$119.7M
Q1 24
$-11.0M
Operating Margin
ECO
ECO
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
41.4%
36.4%
Q3 25
44.2%
34.9%
Q2 25
101.1%
39.2%
Q1 25
49.6%
33.6%
Q4 24
48.7%
31.7%
Q3 24
52.0%
33.7%
Q2 24
56.7%
32.1%
Q1 24
25.9%
Net Margin
ECO
ECO
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
27.9%
Q3 25
25.7%
Q2 25
31.0%
Q1 25
24.8%
Q4 24
31.6%
Q3 24
26.8%
Q2 24
23.9%
Q1 24
-2.2%

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
ECO
ECO
KIM
KIM
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$116.6M
$211.6M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$7.7B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$573.1M
$10.4B
Total Assets
$1.2B
$19.7B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.74×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
ECO
ECO
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
$116.6M
$211.6M
Q3 25
$159.3M
Q2 25
$59.8M
$226.6M
Q1 25
$131.3M
Q4 24
$49.3M
$688.6M
Q3 24
$789.0M
Q2 24
$92.8M
$126.4M
Q1 24
$133.4M
Total Debt
ECO
ECO
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
$7.7B
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
$8.0B
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
Stockholders' Equity
ECO
ECO
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
$573.1M
$10.4B
Q3 25
$10.5B
Q2 25
$428.3M
$10.5B
Q1 25
$10.6B
Q4 24
$410.4M
$10.7B
Q3 24
$10.5B
Q2 24
$432.6M
$10.6B
Q1 24
$10.6B
Total Assets
ECO
ECO
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
$1.2B
$19.7B
Q3 25
$19.9B
Q2 25
$1.1B
$19.8B
Q1 25
$19.7B
Q4 24
$1.1B
$20.3B
Q3 24
$20.1B
Q2 24
$1.1B
$19.5B
Q1 24
$19.5B
Debt / Equity
ECO
ECO
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
0.74×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
0.75×
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
ECO
ECO
KIM
KIM
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$111.3M
$258.4M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.0%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.71×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
ECO
ECO
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
$111.3M
$258.4M
Q3 25
$132.2M
$332.4M
Q2 25
$305.4M
Q1 25
$223.8M
Q4 24
$162.8M
$239.5M
Q3 24
$295.9M
Q2 24
$294.1M
Q1 24
$176.1M
Free Cash Flow
ECO
ECO
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
$205.4M
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
FCF Margin
ECO
ECO
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
38.3%
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
Capex Intensity
ECO
ECO
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
0.0%
Q3 25
0.0%
Q2 25
0.0%
Q1 25
3.4%
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
Cash Conversion
ECO
ECO
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
1.71×
Q3 25
2.41×
Q2 25
1.87×
Q1 25
1.69×
Q4 24
1.44×
Q3 24
2.18×
Q2 24
2.46×
Q1 24

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons