vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimco Realty (KIM) and POTLATCHDELTIC CORP (PCH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Kimco Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($558.0M vs $314.2M, roughly 1.8× POTLATCHDELTIC CORP). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs 8.2%, a 21.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, POTLATCHDELTIC CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (23.1% vs 4.0%). Over the past eight quarters, POTLATCHDELTIC CORP's revenue compounded faster (11.1% CAGR vs 5.6%).

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

PotlatchDeltic Corporation is an American diversified forest products company based in Spokane, Washington.

KIM vs PCH — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
KIM
KIM
1.8× larger
KIM
$558.0M
$314.2M
PCH
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
PCH
PCH
+19.2% gap
PCH
23.1%
4.0%
KIM
Higher net margin
KIM
KIM
21.6% more per $
KIM
29.8%
8.2%
PCH
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
PCH
PCH
Annualised
PCH
11.1%
5.6%
KIM

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025

Metric
KIM
KIM
PCH
PCH
Revenue
$558.0M
$314.2M
Net Profit
$166.3M
$25.9M
Gross Margin
18.2%
Operating Margin
37.2%
11.2%
Net Margin
29.8%
8.2%
Revenue YoY
4.0%
23.1%
Net Profit YoY
23.7%
682.5%
EPS (diluted)
$0.46
$0.33

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
KIM
KIM
PCH
PCH
Q1 26
$558.0M
Q4 25
$542.5M
Q3 25
$535.9M
$314.2M
Q2 25
$525.2M
$275.0M
Q1 25
$536.6M
$268.3M
Q4 24
$525.4M
$258.1M
Q3 24
$507.6M
$255.1M
Q2 24
$500.2M
$320.7M
Net Profit
KIM
KIM
PCH
PCH
Q1 26
$166.3M
Q4 25
$151.2M
Q3 25
$137.8M
$25.9M
Q2 25
$163.0M
$7.4M
Q1 25
$132.8M
$25.8M
Q4 24
$166.0M
$5.2M
Q3 24
$136.0M
$3.3M
Q2 24
$119.7M
$13.7M
Gross Margin
KIM
KIM
PCH
PCH
Q1 26
Q4 25
Q3 25
18.2%
Q2 25
13.0%
Q1 25
17.8%
Q4 24
13.4%
Q3 24
10.8%
Q2 24
11.9%
Operating Margin
KIM
KIM
PCH
PCH
Q1 26
37.2%
Q4 25
36.4%
Q3 25
34.9%
11.2%
Q2 25
39.2%
5.0%
Q1 25
33.6%
10.3%
Q4 24
31.7%
5.2%
Q3 24
33.7%
2.8%
Q2 24
32.1%
5.4%
Net Margin
KIM
KIM
PCH
PCH
Q1 26
29.8%
Q4 25
27.9%
Q3 25
25.7%
8.2%
Q2 25
31.0%
2.7%
Q1 25
24.8%
9.6%
Q4 24
31.6%
2.0%
Q3 24
26.8%
1.3%
Q2 24
23.9%
4.3%
EPS (diluted)
KIM
KIM
PCH
PCH
Q1 26
$0.46
Q4 25
Q3 25
$0.33
Q2 25
$0.09
Q1 25
$0.33
Q4 24
$0.07
Q3 24
$0.04
Q2 24
$0.17

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
KIM
KIM
PCH
PCH
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$88.8M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$10.4B
$1.9B
Total Assets
$19.6B
$3.2B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
KIM
KIM
PCH
PCH
Q1 26
Q4 25
$211.6M
Q3 25
$159.3M
$88.8M
Q2 25
$226.6M
$95.3M
Q1 25
$131.3M
$147.5M
Q4 24
$688.6M
$151.6M
Q3 24
$789.0M
$161.1M
Q2 24
$126.4M
$199.7M
Total Debt
KIM
KIM
PCH
PCH
Q1 26
Q4 25
$7.7B
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
$8.0B
$1.0B
Q3 24
Q2 24
Stockholders' Equity
KIM
KIM
PCH
PCH
Q1 26
$10.4B
Q4 25
$10.4B
Q3 25
$10.5B
$1.9B
Q2 25
$10.5B
$1.9B
Q1 25
$10.6B
$2.0B
Q4 24
$10.7B
$2.0B
Q3 24
$10.5B
$2.1B
Q2 24
$10.6B
$2.1B
Total Assets
KIM
KIM
PCH
PCH
Q1 26
$19.6B
Q4 25
$19.7B
Q3 25
$19.9B
$3.2B
Q2 25
$19.8B
$3.2B
Q1 25
$19.7B
$3.3B
Q4 24
$20.3B
$3.3B
Q3 24
$20.1B
$3.3B
Q2 24
$19.5B
$3.4B
Debt / Equity
KIM
KIM
PCH
PCH
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.74×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
0.75×
0.51×
Q3 24
Q2 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
KIM
KIM
PCH
PCH
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$65.7M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$50.1M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
15.9%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
4.9%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
2.54×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$132.4M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
PCH
PCH
Q1 26
Q4 25
$258.4M
Q3 25
$332.4M
$65.7M
Q2 25
$305.4M
$41.0M
Q1 25
$223.8M
$49.1M
Q4 24
$239.5M
$45.4M
Q3 24
$295.9M
$26.5M
Q2 24
$294.1M
$100.6M
Free Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
PCH
PCH
Q1 26
Q4 25
Q3 25
$50.1M
Q2 25
$30.6M
Q1 25
$205.4M
$26.3M
Q4 24
$25.4M
Q3 24
$-8.2M
Q2 24
$72.4M
FCF Margin
KIM
KIM
PCH
PCH
Q1 26
Q4 25
Q3 25
15.9%
Q2 25
11.1%
Q1 25
38.3%
9.8%
Q4 24
9.9%
Q3 24
-3.2%
Q2 24
22.6%
Capex Intensity
KIM
KIM
PCH
PCH
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.0%
Q3 25
0.0%
4.9%
Q2 25
0.0%
3.8%
Q1 25
3.4%
8.5%
Q4 24
7.7%
Q3 24
13.6%
Q2 24
8.8%
Cash Conversion
KIM
KIM
PCH
PCH
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.71×
Q3 25
2.41×
2.54×
Q2 25
1.87×
5.58×
Q1 25
1.69×
1.90×
Q4 24
1.44×
8.74×
Q3 24
2.18×
7.99×
Q2 24
2.46×
7.35×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

KIM
KIM

Revenues from rental properties, net$552.8M99%
Management and other fee income$5.2M1%

PCH
PCH

Lumber$131.8M42%
Timberlands$52.5M17%
Rural Real Estate$51.3M16%
Residuals And Panels$34.0M11%
Pulpwood$16.7M5%
Development Real Estate$14.6M5%
Other$8.1M3%
Other Products$5.2M2%

Related Comparisons