vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. (ECO) and Root, Inc. (ROOT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Root, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($397.0M vs $393.2M, roughly 1.0× Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp.). Over the past eight quarters, Root, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (24.8% CAGR vs 20.5%).
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. is a global shipping enterprise specializing in the operation of eco-friendly tanker fleets. Its core business covers maritime transport of crude oil and refined petroleum products, serving major energy and commodity clients across key international trade routes, with a focus on cutting carbon emissions via energy-efficient vessel designs.
Root Insurance Company is an online car insurance company operating in the United States.
ECO vs ROOT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $393.2M | $397.0M |
| Net Profit | — | — |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 41.4% | 2.6% |
| Net Margin | — | — |
| Revenue YoY | — | 21.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.35 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $393.2M | $397.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $308.0M | $387.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-49.0M | $382.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $111.1M | $349.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $413.1M | $326.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $321.4M | $305.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $232.4M | $289.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $254.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-5.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $22.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $18.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $22.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-7.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-6.2M |
| Q4 25 | 41.4% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 101.1% | 7.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 49.6% | 6.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.7% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.0% | 11.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 56.7% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -2.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.35 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.35 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.29 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.42 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.52 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.42 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $116.6M | $669.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $200.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $573.1M | $284.3M |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $1.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.70× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $116.6M | $669.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $653.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.8M | $641.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $609.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.3M | $599.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $674.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.8M | $667.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $640.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $200.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $200.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $200.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $200.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $200.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $300.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $300.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $299.3M |
| Q4 25 | $573.1M | $284.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $265.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $428.3M | $244.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $228.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $410.4M | $203.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $181.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $432.6M | $151.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $165.7M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.76× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.82× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.98× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.65× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.98× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.81× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $111.3M | $206.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $111.3M | $206.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $132.2M | $57.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $52.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $26.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.8M | $195.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $49.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $62.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $14.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $195.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $62.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $14.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 59.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 21.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.36× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.17× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
