vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. (ECO) and SM Energy Co (SM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SM Energy Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($704.9M vs $393.2M, roughly 1.8× Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp.). Over the past eight quarters, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (20.5% CAGR vs 12.2%).
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. is a global shipping enterprise specializing in the operation of eco-friendly tanker fleets. Its core business covers maritime transport of crude oil and refined petroleum products, serving major energy and commodity clients across key international trade routes, with a focus on cutting carbon emissions via energy-efficient vessel designs.
SM Energy Company is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is organized in Delaware and headquartered in Denver, Colorado.
ECO vs SM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $393.2M | $704.9M |
| Net Profit | — | — |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 41.4% | 25.9% |
| Net Margin | — | — |
| Revenue YoY | — | -17.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.94 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $393.2M | $704.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $308.0M | $811.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-49.0M | $792.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $111.1M | $844.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $413.1M | $852.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $321.4M | $643.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $232.4M | $634.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $559.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $155.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $201.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $182.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $240.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $210.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $131.2M |
| Q4 25 | 41.4% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.2% | 30.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 101.1% | 37.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 49.6% | 32.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.7% | 33.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.0% | 51.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 56.7% | 44.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 31.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 25.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 37.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 23.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.94 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.35 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.76 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.59 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.63 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.82 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $116.6M | $368.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $573.1M | $4.8B |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $9.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $116.6M | $368.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $162.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.8M | $101.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $54.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.8M | $487.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $506.3M |
| Q4 25 | $573.1M | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $428.3M | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $410.4M | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $432.6M | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.7B |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $9.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $9.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $8.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $6.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.4B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $111.3M | $451.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $111.3M | $451.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $132.2M | $505.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $571.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $483.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.8M | $578.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $452.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $476.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $276.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.26× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.83× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.88× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.27× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.10× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
