vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. (ECO) and INTERFACE INC (TILE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($393.2M vs $331.0M, roughly 1.2× INTERFACE INC). Over the past eight quarters, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (20.5% CAGR vs -2.3%).
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. is a global shipping enterprise specializing in the operation of eco-friendly tanker fleets. Its core business covers maritime transport of crude oil and refined petroleum products, serving major energy and commodity clients across key international trade routes, with a focus on cutting carbon emissions via energy-efficient vessel designs.
Interface, Inc., headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, is a global manufacturer of commercial flooring. The company sells modular carpet tiles, luxury vinyl tile, and Nora brand rubber flooring.
ECO vs TILE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $393.2M | $331.0M |
| Net Profit | — | $23.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 38.3% |
| Operating Margin | 41.4% | 9.8% |
| Net Margin | — | 7.1% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 11.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 81.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.40 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $331.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $393.2M | $349.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $308.0M | $364.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-49.0M | $375.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $111.1M | $297.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $413.1M | $335.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $321.4M | $344.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $232.4M | $346.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $23.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $32.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $21.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $28.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $22.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 38.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 39.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 39.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 37.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 36.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 35.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 41.4% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.2% | 14.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 101.1% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 49.6% | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.7% | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.0% | 12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 56.7% | 11.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 7.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.40 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.41 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.78 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.55 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.38 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $116.6M | $61.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $196.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $573.1M | $634.6M |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.31× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $61.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $116.6M | $71.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $187.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.8M | $121.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $97.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.3M | $99.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $115.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.8M | $94.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $196.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $181.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $307.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $304.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $302.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $302.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $337.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $387.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $634.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $573.1M | $640.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $621.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $428.3M | $575.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $513.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $410.4M | $489.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $501.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $432.6M | $451.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.31× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.53× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.67× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.86× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $111.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $111.3M | $49.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $132.2M | $76.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $30.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.8M | $38.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $76.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $21.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $28.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $66.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $22.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $69.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $12.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.93× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.95× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ECO
Segment breakdown not available.
TILE
| AMS | $195.7M | 59% |
| EAAA | $135.4M | 41% |
