vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of INTERFACE INC (TILE) and WYNDHAM HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. (WH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
WYNDHAM HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($334.0M vs $331.0M, roughly 1.0× INTERFACE INC). INTERFACE INC runs the higher net margin — 7.1% vs -18.0%, a 25.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, INTERFACE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.3% vs -76.3%). Over the past eight quarters, INTERFACE INC's revenue compounded faster (-2.3% CAGR vs -4.6%).
Interface, Inc., headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, is a global manufacturer of commercial flooring. The company sells modular carpet tiles, luxury vinyl tile, and Nora brand rubber flooring.
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc., is an American hospitality company based in Parsippany, New Jersey, United States. It describes itself as the largest hotel franchisor in the world, with 9,100 locations.
TILE vs WH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $331.0M | $334.0M |
| Net Profit | $23.6M | $-60.0M |
| Gross Margin | 38.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | 9.8% | — |
| Net Margin | 7.1% | -18.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.3% | -76.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 81.5% | -170.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.40 | $-0.80 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $331.0M | $334.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $349.4M | $334.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $364.5M | $382.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $375.5M | $397.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $297.4M | $316.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $335.0M | $336.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $344.3M | $396.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $346.6M | $367.0M |
| Q1 26 | $23.6M | $-60.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $24.4M | $-60.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.1M | $105.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.6M | $87.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.0M | $61.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.8M | $85.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.4M | $102.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.6M | $86.0M |
| Q1 26 | 38.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | 9.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.1% | -11.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.6% | 46.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.9% | 37.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | 35.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.8% | 38.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.3% | 43.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.0% | 39.5% |
| Q1 26 | 7.1% | -18.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | -18.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.7% | 27.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.7% | 21.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.4% | 19.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.5% | 25.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.3% | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 23.4% |
| Q1 26 | $0.40 | $-0.80 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.41 | $-0.77 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.78 | $1.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.55 | $1.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.22 | $0.78 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.38 | $1.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.48 | $1.29 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.38 | $1.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $61.2M | $64.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $196.5M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $634.6M | $468.0M |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $4.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.31× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $61.2M | $64.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $71.3M | $64.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $187.4M | $70.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $121.7M | $50.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $97.8M | $48.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $99.2M | $103.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.6M | $72.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $94.2M | $70.0M |
| Q1 26 | $196.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $181.6M | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $307.8M | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $304.4M | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $302.9M | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $302.8M | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $337.9M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $387.6M | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | $634.6M | $468.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $640.7M | $468.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $621.0M | $583.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $575.0M | $570.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $513.1M | $579.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $489.1M | $650.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $501.6M | $583.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $451.2M | $623.0M |
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $4.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $4.2B |
| Q1 26 | 0.31× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.28× | 5.37× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.50× | 4.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.53× | 4.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.59× | 4.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.62× | 3.72× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.67× | 4.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.86× | 3.83× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $367.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $168.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 50.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $437.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $367.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $49.3M | $152.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $76.7M | $86.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.1M | $70.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.7M | $59.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.0M | $134.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $76.2M | $79.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.5M | $1.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $168.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $28.6M | $136.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.1M | $75.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.8M | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.3M | $52.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.4M | $109.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.7M | $71.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.0M | $-6.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 50.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.2% | 40.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.1% | 19.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.1% | 14.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | 16.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.3% | 32.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | 17.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.5% | -1.6% |
| Q1 26 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.9% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.1% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | 1.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.02× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.66× | 0.82× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.93× | 0.80× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.90× | 0.97× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.75× | 1.58× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.68× | 0.77× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.95× | 0.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
TILE
| AMS | $195.7M | 59% |
| EAAA | $135.4M | 41% |
WH
| Fee-related and other revenues | $334.0M | 100% |
| Management and other fees | $2.0M | 1% |
