vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ECARX Holdings Inc. (ECX) and Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Federal Realty Investment Trust is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($336.0M vs $323.3M, roughly 1.0× ECARX Holdings Inc.). Federal Realty Investment Trust runs the higher net margin — 38.6% vs -21.4%, a 60.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Federal Realty Investment Trust posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.7% vs 6.5%).
ECARX Holdings Inc. is a global mobility technology provider specializing in integrated smart vehicle solutions, including in-vehicle infotainment systems, advanced driver assistance technologies, and connected car cloud services. It primarily partners with automotive manufacturers across the world, with a strong operational presence in the Chinese and European markets.
Federal Realty Investment Trust is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers in the Northeastern United States, the Mid-Atlantic states, California, and South Florida.
ECX vs FRT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $323.3M | $336.0M |
| Net Profit | $-69.1M | $129.7M |
| Gross Margin | 15.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | -20.2% | 53.8% |
| Net Margin | -21.4% | 38.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.5% | 8.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 12.8% | 103.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.20 | $1.49 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $336.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $336.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $322.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.3M | $311.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $309.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $311.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $303.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $303.5M | $296.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $129.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $129.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $61.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-69.1M | $155.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $63.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $65.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $61.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-79.2M | $112.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 53.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 53.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 34.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -20.2% | 65.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 35.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 35.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 34.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -22.2% | 53.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -21.4% | 50.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -26.1% | 37.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.49 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.49 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.20 | $1.78 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.72 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.74 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.70 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.23 | $1.32 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $86.2M | $107.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $5.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-293.7M | $3.2B |
| Total Assets | $494.9M | $9.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.53× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $107.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $107.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $111.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.2M | $177.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $109.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $123.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $97.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $108.4M | $103.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-293.7M | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-198.5M | $3.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $9.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $9.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $494.9M | $8.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $555.0M | $8.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.53× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.53× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.42× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-82.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-86.5M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -26.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $622.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $147.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-82.0M | $150.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $179.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $574.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $144.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-57.1M | $169.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-86.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-64.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -26.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -21.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.80× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.40× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.97× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.81× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.77× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.36× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.52× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
