vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ECARX Holdings Inc. (ECX) and International General Insurance Holdings Ltd. (IGIC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
International General Insurance Holdings Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($403.8M vs $323.3M, roughly 1.2× ECARX Holdings Inc.). International General Insurance Holdings Ltd. runs the higher net margin — 26.0% vs -21.4%, a 47.4% gap on every dollar of revenue.
ECARX Holdings Inc. is a global mobility technology provider specializing in integrated smart vehicle solutions, including in-vehicle infotainment systems, advanced driver assistance technologies, and connected car cloud services. It primarily partners with automotive manufacturers across the world, with a strong operational presence in the Chinese and European markets.
China Taiping Insurance Holdings Company Limited (CTIH) formerly China Insurance International Holdings Company Limited (CIIH), is a Chinese insurance conglomerate. The company has strong Chinese Central Government background despite being incorporated in Hong Kong. It is considered as a red chip company.
ECX vs IGIC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $323.3M | $403.8M |
| Net Profit | $-69.1M | $105.1M |
| Gross Margin | 15.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | -20.2% | — |
| Net Margin | -21.4% | 26.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.5% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 12.8% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.20 | $2.31 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $403.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.3M | $261.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $369.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $303.5M | $265.8M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $293.0M |
| Q3 25 | — | $105.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-69.1M | $61.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-134.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-79.2M | $70.7M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-103.7M |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.6% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -20.2% | 24.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -22.2% | -73.3% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 26.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -21.4% | 23.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -36.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -26.1% | 26.6% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -35.4% |
| Q3 25 | — | $2.31 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.20 | $1.36 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.82 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.23 | $1.55 | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $86.2M | $244.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-293.7M | $654.8M |
| Total Assets | $494.9M | $2.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $244.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.2M | $164.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $219.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $108.4M | $237.3M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $122.2M |
| Q3 25 | — | $654.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-293.7M | $662.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $540.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-198.5M | $588.2M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $411.0M |
| Q3 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $494.9M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $555.0M | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $1.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-82.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-86.5M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -26.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-82.0M | $27.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-57.1M | $120.7M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-86.5M | $26.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-64.9M | $119.8M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -26.7% | 10.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -21.4% | 45.1% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.71× | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
