vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Consolidated Edison (ED) and Garmin (GRMN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Garmin is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.8B vs $4.0M, roughly 438.9× Consolidated Edison). On growth, Garmin posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.0% vs 8.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Garmin's revenue compounded faster (7.9% CAGR vs -96.5%).
Consolidated Edison, Inc., commonly known as Con Edison or ConEd, is an energy company based in New York City. It is one of the largest investor-owned energy companies in the United States, with approximately $15.26 billion in annual revenues as of 2024, and over $70 billion in assets. The company provides a wide range of energy-related products and services to its customers through its subsidiaries:Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
Garmin Ltd. is an American multinational technology company based in Olathe, Kansas. The company designs, develops, manufactures, markets, and distributes GPS-enabled products and other navigation, communication, sensor-based, and information products to the automotive, aviation, marine, outdoors, and sport markets.
ED vs GRMN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.0M | $1.8B |
| Net Profit | — | $405.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 59.4% |
| Operating Margin | 12.2% | 24.6% |
| Net Margin | — | 23.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.9% | 14.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 21.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.82 | $2.09 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $4.0M | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $405.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $298.0M | $528.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $688.0M | $401.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $246.0M | $400.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $791.0M | $332.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $310.0M | $435.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $588.0M | $399.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $202.0M | $300.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 59.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 59.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 59.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 58.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 57.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 59.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 60.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 57.3% |
| Q1 26 | 12.2% | 24.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.3% | 28.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.2% | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.8% | 26.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.0% | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.0% | 28.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.4% | 27.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 22.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 23.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.5% | 24.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.1% | 22.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.8% | 22.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.2% | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | 23.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.9% | 25.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.1% | 20.0% |
| Q1 26 | $0.82 | $2.09 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.81 | $2.72 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.90 | $2.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.68 | $2.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.25 | $1.72 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.89 | $2.24 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.69 | $2.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.58 | $1.56 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $2.3B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | — |
| Total Assets | — | $11.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $181.0M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $360.0M | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $93.0M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $1.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $25.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $24.2B | $9.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.2B | $8.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.8B | $8.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.8B | $8.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.0B | $7.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.9B | $7.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.6B | $7.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $11.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $74.6B | $11.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $71.8B | $10.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.5B | $10.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $70.7B | $9.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.6B | $9.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $68.6B | $9.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $67.9B | $8.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.07× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.13× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $536.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $469.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 26.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.32× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.5B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $536.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $553.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $504.0M | $485.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $173.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $837.0M | $420.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $483.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $392.0M | $258.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $255.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $469.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $429.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $425.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $127.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $380.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $399.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $219.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $218.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | 26.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 20.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 24.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 14.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.32× | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.97× | 1.05× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.73× | 1.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.04× | 0.43× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.06× | 1.26× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.23× | 1.11× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.67× | 0.65× | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.63× | 0.85× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ED
| Electric | $2.9M | 72% |
| Gas | $923.0K | 23% |
| Other | $187.0K | 5% |
| Non-utility | $1.0K | 0% |
GRMN
Segment breakdown not available.
