vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Consolidated Edison (ED) and Solid Power, Inc. (SLDP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Consolidated Edison is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.0M vs $3.6M, roughly 1.1× Solid Power, Inc.). On growth, Consolidated Edison posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.9% vs -18.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Solid Power, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-21.9% CAGR vs -96.5%).
Consolidated Edison, Inc., commonly known as Con Edison or ConEd, is an energy company based in New York City. It is one of the largest investor-owned energy companies in the United States, with approximately $15.26 billion in annual revenues as of 2024, and over $70 billion in assets. The company provides a wide range of energy-related products and services to its customers through its subsidiaries:Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
Solid Energy was the largest coal mining company in New Zealand and is a state owned enterprise of the New Zealand Government.
ED vs SLDP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.0M | $3.6M |
| Net Profit | — | — |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 12.2% | -730.1% |
| Net Margin | — | — |
| Revenue YoY | 8.9% | -18.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.82 | $-0.15 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $4.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $3.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.6B | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $6.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9B | $6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.2B | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $5.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $298.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $688.0M | $-25.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $246.0M | $-25.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $791.0M | $-15.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $310.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $588.0M | $-22.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $202.0M | $-22.3M |
| Q1 26 | 12.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.3% | -730.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.2% | -654.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.8% | -398.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.0% | -399.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.0% | -561.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.4% | -593.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | -530.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.1% | -693.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.8% | -390.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.2% | -251.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.9% | -482.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.1% | -438.9% |
| Q1 26 | $0.82 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.81 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.90 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.68 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.25 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.89 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.69 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.58 | $-0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $250.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $415.7M |
| Total Assets | — | $455.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $250.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $181.0M | $251.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $230.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $360.0M | $240.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $118.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $93.0M | $132.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $140.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $25.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $24.2B | $415.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.2B | $381.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.8B | $370.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.8B | $397.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.0B | $410.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.9B | $439.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.6B | $456.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $74.6B | $455.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $71.8B | $416.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.5B | $398.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $70.7B | $419.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.6B | $448.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $68.6B | $470.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $67.9B | $492.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.07× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.13× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-18.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-23.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -633.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 126.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-83.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $-18.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $504.0M | $-14.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $-14.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $837.0M | $-26.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $-13.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $392.0M | $-9.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $-11.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-23.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-14.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-17.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-28.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-18.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-12.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-15.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -633.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -397.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -264.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -476.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -416.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -271.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -305.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 126.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 41.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 39.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 105.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 59.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 86.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.97× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.04× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.06× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.23× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.67× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.63× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ED
| Electric | $2.9M | 72% |
| Gas | $923.0K | 23% |
| Other | $187.0K | 5% |
| Non-utility | $1.0K | 0% |
SLDP
Segment breakdown not available.
