vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EURONET WORLDWIDE, INC. (EEFT) and CHART INDUSTRIES INC (GTLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
EURONET WORLDWIDE, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.0× CHART INDUSTRIES INC). CHART INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — 5.0% vs 4.7%, a 0.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, EURONET WORLDWIDE, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.9% vs -2.5%). EURONET WORLDWIDE, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($434.3M vs $66.2M). Over the past eight quarters, EURONET WORLDWIDE, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (13.7% CAGR vs 6.6%).
Euronet Worldwide is an American provider of global electronic payment services with headquarters in Leawood, Kansas. It offers automated teller machines (ATM), point of sale (POS) services, credit/debit card services, currency exchange and other electronic financial services and payments software. Among others, it provides the prepaid subsidiaries Transact, PaySpot, epay, Movilcarga, TeleRecarga and ATX.
Oricon Inc. , established in 1999, is the holding company at the head of a Japanese corporate group that supplies statistics and information on music and the music industry in Japan and Western music. It started as Original Confidence Inc. , which was founded by Sōkō Koike in November 1967 and became known for its music charts. Oricon Inc. was originally set up as a subsidiary of Original Confidence and took over the latter's Oricon record charts in April 2002.
EEFT vs GTLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $51.8M | $53.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 33.3% |
| Operating Margin | 9.1% | 11.6% |
| Net Margin | 4.7% | 5.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.9% | -2.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 14.3% | -32.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.97 | $1.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $915.5M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $986.2M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $857.0M | $950.7M |
| Q4 25 | $51.8M | $53.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $122.0M | $-138.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $97.6M | $76.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.4M | $49.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.3M | $79.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $151.5M | $69.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.1M | $58.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.2M | $11.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 33.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 33.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 33.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 31.8% |
| Q4 25 | 9.1% | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.0% | -8.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.2% | 15.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.7% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.6% | 16.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.6% | 16.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.5% | 11.9% |
| Q4 25 | 4.7% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.6% | -12.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.1% | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.2% | 4.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.8% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.4% | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.1% | 1.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.97 | $1.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.75 | $-3.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.27 | $1.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.85 | $0.94 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.96 | $1.57 | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.21 | $1.33 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.73 | $1.10 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.55 | $0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.0B | $366.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.0B | $3.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.3B | $3.2B |
| Total Assets | $6.5B | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.79× | 1.13× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $366.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $399.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $342.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $296.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $308.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $310.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $247.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $191.9M |
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $2.7B |
| Q4 25 | $6.5B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3B | $9.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.6B | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.1B | $9.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.8B | $9.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3B | $9.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.1B | $9.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.7B | $9.2B |
| Q4 25 | 0.79× | 1.13× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.85× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.46× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.92× | 1.33× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.88× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.85× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.01× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $559.8M | $88.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $434.3M | $66.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 39.2% | 6.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 11.3% | 2.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 10.81× | 1.66× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $722.3M | $202.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $559.8M | $88.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $197.3M | $118.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $182.9M | $145.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7M | $-60.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $732.8M | $281.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $440.3M | $200.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $182.2M | $116.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.0M | $-95.1M |
| Q4 25 | $434.3M | $66.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $161.2M | $94.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $148.3M | $122.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.5M | $-80.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $615.6M | $260.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $414.5M | $174.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $148.8M | $88.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.2M | $-141.2M |
| Q4 25 | 39.2% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.1% | 8.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.8% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.3% | -8.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 58.8% | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.7% | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.1% | 8.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | -14.9% |
| Q4 25 | 11.3% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.3% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.4% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.8% | 4.8% |
| Q4 25 | 10.81× | 1.66× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.62× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.87× | 1.92× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.04× | -1.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.18× | 3.54× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.91× | 2.91× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.19× | 1.98× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.15× | -8.42× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EEFT
Segment breakdown not available.
GTLS
| Repair Service And Leasing Segment | $330.4M | 31% |
| Heat Transfer Systems Segment | $325.8M | 30% |
| Specialty Products Segment | $259.5M | 24% |
| Transferred Over Time | $94.4M | 9% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $69.5M | 6% |
