vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of EURONET WORLDWIDE, INC. (EEFT) and JBT Marel Corp (JBTM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

EURONET WORLDWIDE, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $1.0B, roughly 1.1× JBT Marel Corp). JBT Marel Corp runs the higher net margin — 5.3% vs 4.7%, a 0.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, JBT Marel Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (115.6% vs 5.9%). EURONET WORLDWIDE, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($434.3M vs $83.5M). Over the past eight quarters, JBT Marel Corp's revenue compounded faster (60.3% CAGR vs 13.7%).

Euronet Worldwide is an American provider of global electronic payment services with headquarters in Leawood, Kansas. It offers automated teller machines (ATM), point of sale (POS) services, credit/debit card services, currency exchange and other electronic financial services and payments software. Among others, it provides the prepaid subsidiaries Transact, PaySpot, epay, Movilcarga, TeleRecarga and ATX.

JBT Marel Corporation, formerly known as JBT Corporation, or John Bean Technologies Corporation, is a food processing machinery and automated vehicle company. The company was incorporated in 2008 when FMC Technologies divested its non-energy businesses. The company is based in Chicago, Illinois and traces its history back to a company founded in 1884 by John Bean, an orchardist in Los Gatos, California.

EEFT vs JBTM — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
EEFT
EEFT
1.1× larger
EEFT
$1.1B
$1.0B
JBTM
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
JBTM
JBTM
+109.7% gap
JBTM
115.6%
5.9%
EEFT
Higher net margin
JBTM
JBTM
0.6% more per $
JBTM
5.3%
4.7%
EEFT
More free cash flow
EEFT
EEFT
$350.8M more FCF
EEFT
$434.3M
$83.5M
JBTM
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
JBTM
JBTM
Annualised
JBTM
60.3%
13.7%
EEFT

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
EEFT
EEFT
JBTM
JBTM
Revenue
$1.1B
$1.0B
Net Profit
$51.8M
$53.1M
Gross Margin
34.5%
Operating Margin
9.1%
7.2%
Net Margin
4.7%
5.3%
Revenue YoY
5.9%
115.6%
Net Profit YoY
14.3%
858.6%
EPS (diluted)
$0.97
$1.04

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
EEFT
EEFT
JBTM
JBTM
Q4 25
$1.1B
$1.0B
Q3 25
$1.1B
$1.0B
Q2 25
$1.1B
$934.8M
Q1 25
$915.5M
$854.1M
Q4 24
$1.0B
$467.6M
Q3 24
$1.1B
$453.8M
Q2 24
$986.2M
$402.3M
Q1 24
$857.0M
$392.3M
Net Profit
EEFT
EEFT
JBTM
JBTM
Q4 25
$51.8M
$53.1M
Q3 25
$122.0M
$66.0M
Q2 25
$97.6M
$3.4M
Q1 25
$38.4M
$-173.0M
Q4 24
$45.3M
$-7.0M
Q3 24
$151.5M
$38.9M
Q2 24
$83.1M
$30.7M
Q1 24
$26.2M
$22.8M
Gross Margin
EEFT
EEFT
JBTM
JBTM
Q4 25
34.5%
Q3 25
35.9%
Q2 25
35.8%
Q1 25
34.2%
Q4 24
38.4%
Q3 24
36.1%
Q2 24
35.6%
Q1 24
35.8%
Operating Margin
EEFT
EEFT
JBTM
JBTM
Q4 25
9.1%
7.2%
Q3 25
17.0%
10.2%
Q2 25
14.8%
5.2%
Q1 25
8.2%
-3.9%
Q4 24
11.7%
3.4%
Q3 24
16.6%
10.3%
Q2 24
13.6%
6.7%
Q1 24
7.5%
7.4%
Net Margin
EEFT
EEFT
JBTM
JBTM
Q4 25
4.7%
5.3%
Q3 25
10.6%
6.6%
Q2 25
9.1%
0.4%
Q1 25
4.2%
-20.3%
Q4 24
4.3%
-1.5%
Q3 24
13.8%
8.6%
Q2 24
8.4%
7.6%
Q1 24
3.1%
5.8%
EPS (diluted)
EEFT
EEFT
JBTM
JBTM
Q4 25
$0.97
$1.04
Q3 25
$2.75
$1.26
Q2 25
$2.27
$0.07
Q1 25
$0.85
$-3.35
Q4 24
$0.96
$-0.22
Q3 24
$3.21
$1.21
Q2 24
$1.73
$0.95
Q1 24
$0.55
$0.71

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
EEFT
EEFT
JBTM
JBTM
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$1.0B
$167.9M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$1.0B
$1.5B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.3B
$4.5B
Total Assets
$6.5B
$8.2B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.79×
0.33×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
EEFT
EEFT
JBTM
JBTM
Q4 25
$1.0B
$167.9M
Q3 25
$1.2B
Q2 25
$1.3B
Q1 25
$1.4B
Q4 24
$1.3B
$1.2B
Q3 24
$1.5B
Q2 24
$1.3B
Q1 24
$1.2B
Total Debt
EEFT
EEFT
JBTM
JBTM
Q4 25
$1.0B
$1.5B
Q3 25
$1.1B
$1.5B
Q2 25
$1.0B
$1.5B
Q1 25
$1.9B
$2.0B
Q4 24
$1.1B
$1.3B
Q3 24
$1.2B
$648.3M
Q2 24
$1.0B
$647.7M
Q1 24
$1.3B
$647.0M
Stockholders' Equity
EEFT
EEFT
JBTM
JBTM
Q4 25
$1.3B
$4.5B
Q3 25
$1.3B
$4.4B
Q2 25
$1.4B
$4.4B
Q1 25
$1.3B
$4.1B
Q4 24
$1.2B
$1.5B
Q3 24
$1.4B
$1.6B
Q2 24
$1.2B
$1.5B
Q1 24
$1.2B
$1.5B
Total Assets
EEFT
EEFT
JBTM
JBTM
Q4 25
$6.5B
$8.2B
Q3 25
$6.3B
$8.2B
Q2 25
$6.6B
$8.3B
Q1 25
$6.1B
$8.0B
Q4 24
$5.8B
$3.4B
Q3 24
$6.3B
$2.8B
Q2 24
$6.1B
$2.7B
Q1 24
$5.7B
$2.7B
Debt / Equity
EEFT
EEFT
JBTM
JBTM
Q4 25
0.79×
0.33×
Q3 25
0.85×
0.34×
Q2 25
0.74×
0.35×
Q1 25
1.46×
0.48×
Q4 24
0.92×
0.81×
Q3 24
0.88×
0.41×
Q2 24
0.85×
0.43×
Q1 24
1.01×
0.43×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
EEFT
EEFT
JBTM
JBTM
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$559.8M
$117.4M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$434.3M
$83.5M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
39.2%
8.3%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
11.3%
3.4%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
10.81×
2.21×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$722.3M
$238.1M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
EEFT
EEFT
JBTM
JBTM
Q4 25
$559.8M
$117.4M
Q3 25
$197.3M
$87.7M
Q2 25
$182.9M
$102.2M
Q1 25
$1.7M
$34.4M
Q4 24
$732.8M
$128.7M
Q3 24
$440.3M
$71.9M
Q2 24
$182.2M
$21.6M
Q1 24
$30.0M
$10.4M
Free Cash Flow
EEFT
EEFT
JBTM
JBTM
Q4 25
$434.3M
$83.5M
Q3 25
$161.2M
$56.5M
Q2 25
$148.3M
$83.7M
Q1 25
$-21.5M
$14.4M
Q4 24
$615.6M
$118.7M
Q3 24
$414.5M
$65.0M
Q2 24
$148.8M
$11.1M
Q1 24
$6.2M
$-100.0K
FCF Margin
EEFT
EEFT
JBTM
JBTM
Q4 25
39.2%
8.3%
Q3 25
14.1%
5.6%
Q2 25
13.8%
9.0%
Q1 25
-2.3%
1.7%
Q4 24
58.8%
25.4%
Q3 24
37.7%
14.3%
Q2 24
15.1%
2.8%
Q1 24
0.7%
-0.0%
Capex Intensity
EEFT
EEFT
JBTM
JBTM
Q4 25
11.3%
3.4%
Q3 25
3.2%
3.1%
Q2 25
3.2%
2.0%
Q1 25
2.5%
2.3%
Q4 24
11.2%
2.1%
Q3 24
2.3%
1.5%
Q2 24
3.4%
2.6%
Q1 24
2.8%
2.7%
Cash Conversion
EEFT
EEFT
JBTM
JBTM
Q4 25
10.81×
2.21×
Q3 25
1.62×
1.33×
Q2 25
1.87×
30.06×
Q1 25
0.04×
Q4 24
16.18×
Q3 24
2.91×
1.85×
Q2 24
2.19×
0.70×
Q1 24
1.15×
0.46×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons