vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of EURONET WORLDWIDE, INC. (EEFT) and Masco (MAS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Masco is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.7× EURONET WORLDWIDE, INC.). Masco runs the higher net margin — 11.9% vs 4.7%, a 7.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Masco posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.5% vs 5.9%). Over the past eight quarters, EURONET WORLDWIDE, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (13.7% CAGR vs -4.2%).

Euronet Worldwide is an American provider of global electronic payment services with headquarters in Leawood, Kansas. It offers automated teller machines (ATM), point of sale (POS) services, credit/debit card services, currency exchange and other electronic financial services and payments software. Among others, it provides the prepaid subsidiaries Transact, PaySpot, epay, Movilcarga, TeleRecarga and ATX.

Masco Corporation is an American manufacturer of products for the home improvement and new home construction markets. Comprising more than 20 companies, the Masco conglomerate operates nearly 60 manufacturing facilities in the United States and over 20 in other parts of the world. Since 1969 it trades on the NYSE. Under the leadership of Richard Manoogian, the company grew exponentially and subsequently joined the Fortune 500 list of largest U.S. corporations.

EEFT vs MAS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
MAS
MAS
1.7× larger
MAS
$1.9B
$1.1B
EEFT
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
MAS
MAS
+0.6% gap
MAS
6.5%
5.9%
EEFT
Higher net margin
MAS
MAS
7.2% more per $
MAS
11.9%
4.7%
EEFT
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
EEFT
EEFT
Annualised
EEFT
13.7%
-4.2%
MAS

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
EEFT
EEFT
MAS
MAS
Revenue
$1.1B
$1.9B
Net Profit
$51.8M
$228.0M
Gross Margin
35.8%
Operating Margin
9.1%
16.5%
Net Margin
4.7%
11.9%
Revenue YoY
5.9%
6.5%
Net Profit YoY
14.3%
14.5%
EPS (diluted)
$0.97

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
EEFT
EEFT
MAS
MAS
Q1 26
$1.9B
Q4 25
$1.1B
$1.8B
Q3 25
$1.1B
$1.9B
Q2 25
$1.1B
$2.1B
Q1 25
$915.5M
$1.8B
Q4 24
$1.0B
$1.8B
Q3 24
$1.1B
$2.0B
Q2 24
$986.2M
$2.1B
Net Profit
EEFT
EEFT
MAS
MAS
Q1 26
$228.0M
Q4 25
$51.8M
$165.0M
Q3 25
$122.0M
$189.0M
Q2 25
$97.6M
$270.0M
Q1 25
$38.4M
$186.0M
Q4 24
$45.3M
$182.0M
Q3 24
$151.5M
$167.0M
Q2 24
$83.1M
$258.0M
Gross Margin
EEFT
EEFT
MAS
MAS
Q1 26
35.8%
Q4 25
33.9%
Q3 25
34.2%
Q2 25
37.6%
Q1 25
35.8%
Q4 24
34.8%
Q3 24
36.6%
Q2 24
37.5%
Operating Margin
EEFT
EEFT
MAS
MAS
Q1 26
16.5%
Q4 25
9.1%
13.8%
Q3 25
17.0%
15.8%
Q2 25
14.8%
20.1%
Q1 25
8.2%
15.9%
Q4 24
11.7%
15.9%
Q3 24
16.6%
18.0%
Q2 24
13.6%
19.0%
Net Margin
EEFT
EEFT
MAS
MAS
Q1 26
11.9%
Q4 25
4.7%
9.2%
Q3 25
10.6%
9.9%
Q2 25
9.1%
13.2%
Q1 25
4.2%
10.3%
Q4 24
4.3%
10.0%
Q3 24
13.8%
8.4%
Q2 24
8.4%
12.3%
EPS (diluted)
EEFT
EEFT
MAS
MAS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$0.97
$0.81
Q3 25
$2.75
$0.90
Q2 25
$2.27
$1.28
Q1 25
$0.85
$0.87
Q4 24
$0.96
$0.85
Q3 24
$3.21
$0.77
Q2 24
$1.73
$1.17

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
EEFT
EEFT
MAS
MAS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$1.0B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$1.0B
$2.9B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.3B
$27.0M
Total Assets
$6.5B
$5.2B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.79×
109.07×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
EEFT
EEFT
MAS
MAS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$1.0B
$647.0M
Q3 25
$1.2B
$559.0M
Q2 25
$1.3B
$390.0M
Q1 25
$1.4B
$377.0M
Q4 24
$1.3B
$634.0M
Q3 24
$1.5B
$646.0M
Q2 24
$1.3B
$398.0M
Total Debt
EEFT
EEFT
MAS
MAS
Q1 26
$2.9B
Q4 25
$1.0B
$2.9B
Q3 25
$1.1B
Q2 25
$1.0B
Q1 25
$1.9B
Q4 24
$1.1B
$2.9B
Q3 24
$1.2B
Q2 24
$1.0B
Stockholders' Equity
EEFT
EEFT
MAS
MAS
Q1 26
$27.0M
Q4 25
$1.3B
$-185.0M
Q3 25
$1.3B
$-78.0M
Q2 25
$1.4B
$-84.0M
Q1 25
$1.3B
$-254.0M
Q4 24
$1.2B
$-279.0M
Q3 24
$1.4B
$-88.0M
Q2 24
$1.2B
$-26.0M
Total Assets
EEFT
EEFT
MAS
MAS
Q1 26
$5.2B
Q4 25
$6.5B
$5.2B
Q3 25
$6.3B
$5.3B
Q2 25
$6.6B
$5.3B
Q1 25
$6.1B
$5.1B
Q4 24
$5.8B
$5.0B
Q3 24
$6.3B
$5.3B
Q2 24
$6.1B
$5.4B
Debt / Equity
EEFT
EEFT
MAS
MAS
Q1 26
109.07×
Q4 25
0.79×
Q3 25
0.85×
Q2 25
0.74×
Q1 25
1.46×
Q4 24
0.92×
Q3 24
0.88×
Q2 24
0.85×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
EEFT
EEFT
MAS
MAS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$559.8M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$434.3M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
39.2%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
11.3%
1.8%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
10.81×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$722.3M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
EEFT
EEFT
MAS
MAS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$559.8M
$418.0M
Q3 25
$197.3M
$456.0M
Q2 25
$182.9M
$306.0M
Q1 25
$1.7M
$-158.0M
Q4 24
$732.8M
$407.0M
Q3 24
$440.3M
$416.0M
Q2 24
$182.2M
$346.0M
Free Cash Flow
EEFT
EEFT
MAS
MAS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$434.3M
$371.0M
Q3 25
$161.2M
$415.0M
Q2 25
$148.3M
$270.0M
Q1 25
$-21.5M
$-190.0M
Q4 24
$615.6M
$351.0M
Q3 24
$414.5M
$378.0M
Q2 24
$148.8M
$303.0M
FCF Margin
EEFT
EEFT
MAS
MAS
Q1 26
Q4 25
39.2%
20.7%
Q3 25
14.1%
21.6%
Q2 25
13.8%
13.2%
Q1 25
-2.3%
-10.5%
Q4 24
58.8%
19.2%
Q3 24
37.7%
19.1%
Q2 24
15.1%
14.5%
Capex Intensity
EEFT
EEFT
MAS
MAS
Q1 26
1.8%
Q4 25
11.3%
2.6%
Q3 25
3.2%
2.1%
Q2 25
3.2%
1.8%
Q1 25
2.5%
1.8%
Q4 24
11.2%
3.1%
Q3 24
2.3%
1.9%
Q2 24
3.4%
2.1%
Cash Conversion
EEFT
EEFT
MAS
MAS
Q1 26
Q4 25
10.81×
2.53×
Q3 25
1.62×
2.41×
Q2 25
1.87×
1.13×
Q1 25
0.04×
-0.85×
Q4 24
16.18×
2.24×
Q3 24
2.91×
2.49×
Q2 24
2.19×
1.34×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons